From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: Re: [Xen-changelog] Rewritten XendLogging to not be a singleton class, and not have methods used Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:44:03 -0700 Message-ID: <871x2tnwz0.fsf@us.ibm.com> References: <1128960126.2826.15.camel@bree.local.net> <20051010161625.GB20935@uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20051010161625.GB20935@uk.xensource.com> (Ewan Mellor's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:16:25 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ewan Mellor Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org EM> xm help doesn't cause any logging for me, so there's actually no EM> file created. I don't know why else someone would be running xm EM> as a non-privileged user -- perhaps someone who does so could EM> speak up? I think that xm should be at least able to run "help" and "help --long" as non-root. It should definitely be able to do so without a stack trace. I don't like blindly running tools as root before I at least get a chance to look at the help output as a non-root user. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com