From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Fix stale-state issue with 'xm dom{id,
	name}'
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:35:04 -0700
Message-ID: <871x31yylz.fsf@us.ibm.com>
References: <87psqqh4ww.fsf@us.ibm.com> <20051004073630.GC4104@linford.intra>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051004073630.GC4104@linford.intra> (Ewan Mellor's message of
	"Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:36:30 +0100")
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


EM> I would be grateful if you could re-run xm-test and let me know
EM> how it looks.  There might still be some bugs to iron out, but
EM> hopefully you will find that the behaviour under xm-test is much
EM> improved.

After two runs of xm-test, I'm not seeing failures on either of the
tests that poke specific stale-state issues.  That's good news :)

I'll see about writing some more tests targeted at stale-state
detection, just to make sure ;)

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com