All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,  <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	<alucerop@amd.com>,  <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
	<dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com>,  <mst@redhat.com>,
	<marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,  <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hw/cxl: Allow BI by default in Window restrictions
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:59:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <873457aii2.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218154832.00000159@huawei.com> (Jonathan Cameron's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:48:32 +0000")

Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> writes:

> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:18:17 +0100
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> writes:
>> 
>> > Update the CFMW restrictions to also permit Back-Invalidate
>> > flows by default, which is aligned with the no-restrictions
>> > policy.
>> >
>> > While at it, document the 'restrictions=' option.  
>> 
>> I'd split the patch.  Up to you.
> Hi Markus,
>
> As you note below the interface hasn't been in any release anyway and
> is part of the long backlog I'm carrying and slowly getting
> upstream. Bringing this in from the start with that restrictions
> control should be fine.
>
> However, backwards compatibility does need addressing
> as this changes the default for things we do create today (with
> no restrictions).
>
> In this particular case, I don't think we care because there are no
> BI capable devices before this series - so there can't be anything
> using this feature for the host memory range it describes.
>
> As such, the only result is the ACPI table says we have an extra
> flag set which no one will care about.  Will need to update
> the ACPI table tests though. I'll check.
>
> Migration of CXL topologies is horribly broken currently anyway
> so that's not a problem here. Given current usecases are strictly
> software stack verification fixing that isn't a priority (yet).

Good to know.  Work into commit message(s)?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 19:52 [PATCH v4 -qemu 0/5] hw/cxl: Support Back-Invalidate Davidlohr Bueso
2025-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] hw/pcie: Support enabling flit mode Davidlohr Bueso
2025-12-18 16:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-18 16:31     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] hw/cxl: Refactor component register initialization Davidlohr Bueso
2025-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/cxl: Allow BI by default in Window restrictions Davidlohr Bueso
2025-12-18  9:18   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-12-18 15:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-18 15:48       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-12-18 15:59       ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2025-12-19 17:53         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-19 17:53           ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] hw/cxl: Support type3 HDM-DB Davidlohr Bueso
2025-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] hw/cxl: Remove register special_ops->read() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-12-16  1:12 ` [PATCH v4 -qemu 0/5] hw/cxl: Support Back-Invalidate Davidlohr Bueso
2025-12-17 13:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-17 13:59     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-12-23 11:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-23 11:53       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-12-30 18:23       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-01-02 16:35         ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 16:35           ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-12-16  6:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-12-16 15:24   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2025-12-17  7:51     ` Markus Armbruster
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-30  3:21 [PATCH v3 " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-09-30  3:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] hw/cxl: Allow BI by default in Window restrictions Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=873457aii2.fsf@pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dongjoo.seo1@samsung.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.