All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: mst@redhat.com,  sgarzare@redhat.com,  dave@treblig.org,
	eblake@redhat.com,  pbonzini@redhat.com,  berrange@redhat.com,
	eduardo@habkost.net,  qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	 Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] [for-10.1] virtio: add VIRTQUEUE_ERROR QAPI event
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:28:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734eongqr.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18763620-2bd9-47a6-a5d4-ff61663bae9a@yandex-team.ru> (Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy's message of "Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:26:42 +0300")

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> writes:

> On 04.04.25 09:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>> 
>>> For now we only log the vhost device error, when virtqueue is actually
>>> stopped. Let's add a QAPI event, which makes possible:
>>>
>>>   - collect statistics of such errors
>>>   - make immediate actions: take core dumps or do some other debugging
>>>   - inform the user through a management API or UI, so that (s)he can
>>>    react somehow, e.g. reset the device driver in the guest or even
>>>    build up some automation to do so
>>>
>>> Note that basically every inconsistency discovered during virtqueue
>>> processing results in a silent virtqueue stop.  The guest then just
>>> sees the requests getting stuck somewhere in the device for no visible
>>> reason.  This event provides a means to inform the management layer of
>>> this situation in a timely fashion.
>>>
>>> The event could be reused for some other virtqueue problems (not only
>>> for vhost devices) in future. For this it gets a generic name and
>>> structure.
>>>
>>> We keep original VHOST_OPS_DEBUG(), to keep original debug output as is
>>> here, it's not the only call to VHOST_OPS_DEBUG in the file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>>> Reviewed-by: Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v5: resend, update version in QAPI to 10.1
>>>     drop a-b by Markus (too much time passed, the context could
>>>     changed. Markus, is the patch still OK?)
>> 
>> Happy to take another look :)
>> 
>>>  hw/virtio/vhost.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>  monitor/monitor.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>>  qapi/qdev.json    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> index 6aa72fd434..0b205cef73 100644
>>> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>>   
>>>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>>  #include "qapi/error.h"
>>> +#include "qapi/qapi-events-qdev.h"
>>>  #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
>>>  #include "qemu/atomic.h"
>>>  #include "qemu/range.h"
>>> @@ -1442,11 +1443,16 @@ static void vhost_virtqueue_error_notifier(EventNotifier *n)
>>>      struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(n, struct vhost_virtqueue,
>>>                                                error_notifier);
>>>      struct vhost_dev *dev = vq->dev;
>>> -    int index = vq - dev->vqs;
>>>  
>>>      if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(n) && dev->vdev) {
>>> -        VHOST_OPS_DEBUG(-EINVAL,  "vhost vring error in virtqueue %d",
>>> -                        dev->vq_index + index);
>>> +        int ind = vq - dev->vqs + dev->vq_index;
>>> +        DeviceState *ds = &dev->vdev->parent_obj;
>>> +
>>> +        VHOST_OPS_DEBUG(-EINVAL,  "vhost vring error in virtqueue %d", ind);
>>> +        qapi_event_send_virtqueue_error(ds->id, ds->canonical_path, ind,
>>> +                                        VIRTQUEUE_ERROR_VHOST_VRING_ERROR,
>>> +                                        "vhost reported failure through vring "
>>> +                                        "error fd");
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/monitor/monitor.c b/monitor/monitor.c
>>> index c5a5d30877..1296a9207e 100644
>>> --- a/monitor/monitor.c
>>> +++ b/monitor/monitor.c
>>> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static MonitorQAPIEventConf monitor_qapi_event_conf[QAPI_EVENT__MAX] = {
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_BALLOON_CHANGE]    = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_QUORUM_REPORT_BAD] = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_QUORUM_FAILURE]    = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>> +    [QAPI_EVENT_VIRTQUEUE_ERROR]   = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_VSERPORT_CHANGE]   = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_MEMORY_DEVICE_SIZE_CHANGE] = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>>      [QAPI_EVENT_HV_BALLOON_STATUS_REPORT] = { 1000 * SCALE_MS },
>>> @@ -499,6 +500,10 @@ static unsigned int qapi_event_throttle_hash(const void *key)
>>>          hash += g_str_hash(qdict_get_str(evstate->data, "qom-path"));
>>>      }
>>>   
>>> +    if (evstate->event == QAPI_EVENT_VIRTQUEUE_ERROR) {
>>> +        hash += g_str_hash(qdict_get_str(evstate->data, "device"));
>> 
>> Isn't @device optional?  Should you use @qom-path instead?
>
> Yes, I'm thinking about it too.

This function and the next one together enable fine-grained event
throttling.  I figure the intent of your patch is to rate-limit this
event per device.  For that, you must use qom-path.  If you wanted to
rate-limit per virtqueue, you'd have to throw in @virtqueue.

As is, you have a crash bugL g_str_hash() expects a non-null argument.

>                                 Maybe, drop the "device" field from the event at all, and keep only qom-path? Years passed since movement to use qom paths..

Possible justifications for having @device: consistency with other
events, convenience for users.  I can't judge the latter.

>
>> 
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      return hash;
>>>  }
>>>   
>>> @@ -527,6 +532,11 @@ static gboolean qapi_event_throttle_equal(const void *a, const void *b)
>>>                         qdict_get_str(evb->data, "qom-path"));
>>>      }
>>>   
>>> +    if (eva->event == QAPI_EVENT_VIRTQUEUE_ERROR) {
>>> +        return !strcmp(qdict_get_str(eva->data, "device"),
>>> +                       qdict_get_str(evb->data, "device"));
>> 
>> Likewise.
>> 
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>      return TRUE;
>>>  }
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/qapi/qdev.json b/qapi/qdev.json
>>> index 25cbcf977b..2d20f4777e 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/qdev.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/qdev.json
>>> @@ -187,3 +187,35 @@
>>>  { 'command': 'device-sync-config',
>>>    'features': [ 'unstable' ],
>>>    'data': {'id': 'str'} }
>>> +
>>> +##
>>> +# @VirtqueueError:
>>> +#
>>> +# @vhost-vring-error: Vhost device reported failure through
>>> +#     through vring error fd.
>> 
>> One "through" too many.
>> 
>> I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to express.  Is it
>> "the vhost device has communicated failure via the vring error file
>> descriptor"?
>
> Yes. Will use your wording.
>
>> 
>> I know next to nothing about vhost devices...
>> 
>>> +#
>>> +# Since: 10.1
>>> +##
>>> +{ 'enum': 'VirtqueueError',
>>> +  'data': [ 'vhost-vring-error' ] }
>>> +
>>> +##
>>> +# @VIRTQUEUE_ERROR:
>>> +#
>>> +# Emitted when a device virtqueue fails in runtime.
>> 
>> I think it's "at runtime".
>> 
>> Can a device have more than one virtqueue?
>
> Yes. And event has "virtqueue": "int" for it.

Got it, thanks!

>>> +#
>>> +# @device: the device's ID if it has one
>>> +#
>>> +# @path: the device's QOM path
>> 
>> I agree with your follow-up: name it @qom-path.
>> 
>>> +#
>>> +# @virtqueue: virtqueue index
>> 
>> Bear with me...  What's a virtqueue index?
>
> sequence number of virtqueue of the vhost device

Maybe something like "the index of the virtqueue that failed".

>>> +#
>>> +# @error: error identifier
>>> +#
>>> +# @description: human readable description
>>> +#
>>> +# Since: 10.1
>>> +##
>>> +{ 'event': 'VIRTQUEUE_ERROR',
>>> + 'data': { '*device': 'str', 'path': 'str', 'virtqueue': 'int',
>>> +            'error': 'VirtqueueError', 'description': 'str'} }
>> 



      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-01 17:07 [PATCH v5] [for-10.1] virtio: add VIRTQUEUE_ERROR QAPI event Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-04-02 12:32 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-04-03  7:37   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-04-04  6:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-04 10:26   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-04-04 14:28     ` Markus Armbruster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8734eongqr.fsf@pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@treblig.org \
    --cc=den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.