* [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long
@ 2025-03-26 9:26 zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement a timeout mechanism zoudongjie via
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-03-26 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
to occur.
This series add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
its execution duration.
Changelog
v3 ---
Unify AIO_WAIT_WHILE_{TIMEOUT/INTERNAL} by replacing AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL() with
AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(..., 0).
v2 ----
1. Support 0 in BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(), 0 means infinite.
2. Use uint64_t timeout_ns instead of int64 timeout to name variables.
3. Use timer_pending() to check for expiry instead of explicitly checking
against the deadline for BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT().
4. Add documentation for bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(), note that bdrv_drained_end()
must be called when -ETIMEDOUT is returned.
5. Add a timeout parameter to the qmp_block_set_io_throttle() instead of hardcoding
the timeout, and the default value is 0, mean an infinite timeout.
v1 patch link:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250308101618.721954-1-zoudongjie@huawei.com/
Zhu Yangyang (2):
io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement
a timeout mechanism.
qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
block/block-backend.c | 14 ++++-
block/io.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++----
block/qapi-system.c | 10 +++-
include/block/aio-wait.h | 47 ++++++++++++-----
include/block/block-io.h | 22 +++++++-
include/system/block-backend-global-state.h | 1 +
qapi/block-core.json | 5 +-
util/aio-wait.c | 5 ++
8 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.33.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement a timeout mechanism.
2025-03-26 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-26 9:26 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle() zoudongjie via
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-03-26 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
The bdrv_drained_begin() function is a blocking function. In scenarios where network storage
is used and network links fail, it may block for a long time.
Therefore, we add a timeout parameter to control the duration of the block.
Since bdrv_drained_begin() has been widely adopted, both bdrv_drained_begin()
and bdrv_drained_begin_timeout() will be retained.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
---
block/io.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/block/aio-wait.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
include/block/block-io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++-
util/aio-wait.c | 5 ++++
4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index 1ba8d1aeea..912b76c4a4 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@ typedef struct {
bool begin;
bool poll;
BdrvChild *parent;
+ uint64_t timeout_ns;
+ int ret;
} BdrvCoDrainData;
/* Returns true if BDRV_POLL_WHILE() should go into a blocking aio_poll() */
@@ -283,6 +285,10 @@ static bool bdrv_drain_poll_top_level(BlockDriverState *bs,
return bdrv_drain_poll(bs, ignore_parent, false);
}
+static int bdrv_do_drained_begin_timeout(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ BdrvChild *parent,
+ bool poll,
+ uint64_t timeout_ns);
static void bdrv_do_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent,
bool poll);
static void bdrv_do_drained_end(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent);
@@ -296,7 +302,9 @@ static void bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb(void *opaque)
if (bs) {
bdrv_dec_in_flight(bs);
if (data->begin) {
- bdrv_do_drained_begin(bs, data->parent, data->poll);
+ data->ret = bdrv_do_drained_begin_timeout(bs, data->parent,
+ data->poll,
+ data->timeout_ns);
} else {
assert(!data->poll);
bdrv_do_drained_end(bs, data->parent);
@@ -310,10 +318,11 @@ static void bdrv_co_drain_bh_cb(void *opaque)
aio_co_wake(co);
}
-static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(BlockDriverState *bs,
- bool begin,
- BdrvChild *parent,
- bool poll)
+static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain_timeout(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ bool begin,
+ BdrvChild *parent,
+ bool poll,
+ uint64_t timeout_ns)
{
BdrvCoDrainData data;
Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
@@ -329,6 +338,8 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(BlockDriverState *bs,
.begin = begin,
.parent = parent,
.poll = poll,
+ .timeout_ns = timeout_ns,
+ .ret = 0
};
if (bs) {
@@ -342,16 +353,27 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(BlockDriverState *bs,
/* If we are resumed from some other event (such as an aio completion or a
* timer callback), it is a bug in the caller that should be fixed. */
assert(data.done);
+ return data.ret;
}
-static void bdrv_do_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent,
- bool poll)
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ bool begin,
+ BdrvChild *parent,
+ bool poll)
+{
+ bdrv_co_yield_to_drain_timeout(bs, begin, parent, poll, 0);
+}
+
+static int bdrv_do_drained_begin_timeout(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ BdrvChild *parent,
+ bool poll,
+ uint64_t timeout_ns)
{
IO_OR_GS_CODE();
if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
- bdrv_co_yield_to_drain(bs, true, parent, poll);
- return;
+ return bdrv_co_yield_to_drain_timeout(bs, true, parent, poll,
+ timeout_ns);
}
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
@@ -375,8 +397,17 @@ static void bdrv_do_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent,
* nodes.
*/
if (poll) {
- BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, bdrv_drain_poll_top_level(bs, parent));
+ return BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(bs,
+ bdrv_drain_poll_top_level(bs, parent),
+ timeout_ns);
}
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void bdrv_do_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent,
+ bool poll)
+{
+ bdrv_do_drained_begin_timeout(bs, parent, poll, 0);
}
void bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *parent)
@@ -391,6 +422,13 @@ bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs)
bdrv_do_drained_begin(bs, NULL, true);
}
+int coroutine_mixed_fn
+bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t timeout_ns)
+{
+ IO_OR_GS_CODE();
+ return bdrv_do_drained_begin_timeout(bs, NULL, true, timeout_ns);
+}
+
/**
* This function does not poll, nor must any of its recursively called
* functions.
diff --git a/include/block/aio-wait.h b/include/block/aio-wait.h
index cf5e8bde1c..7610880b61 100644
--- a/include/block/aio-wait.h
+++ b/include/block/aio-wait.h
@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@ typedef struct {
extern AioWait global_aio_wait;
/**
- * AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL:
+ * AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT:
* @ctx: the aio context, or NULL if multiple aio contexts (for which the
* caller does not hold a lock) are involved in the polling condition.
* @cond: wait while this conditional expression is true
+ * @timeout_ns: maximum duration to wait, in nanoseconds, except the value
+ * is unsigned, 0 means infinite.
*
* Wait while a condition is true. Use this to implement synchronous
* operations that require event loop activity.
@@ -74,37 +76,54 @@ extern AioWait global_aio_wait;
* thread (with @ctx acquired exactly once). This function cannot be used to
* wait on conditions between two IOThreads since that could lead to deadlock,
* go via the main loop instead.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if succeeded; -ETIMEDOUT when a timeout occurs.
*/
-#define AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL(ctx, cond) ({ \
- bool waited_ = false; \
+#define AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(ctx, cond, timeout_ns) ({ \
+ int ret_ = 0; \
+ uint64_t timeout_ = (timeout_ns); \
AioWait *wait_ = &global_aio_wait; \
AioContext *ctx_ = (ctx); \
+ AioContext *current_ctx_ = NULL; \
+ QEMUTimer timer_; \
/* Increment wait_->num_waiters before evaluating cond. */ \
qatomic_inc(&wait_->num_waiters); \
/* Paired with smp_mb in aio_wait_kick(). */ \
smp_mb__after_rmw(); \
if (ctx_ && in_aio_context_home_thread(ctx_)) { \
- while ((cond)) { \
- aio_poll(ctx_, true); \
- waited_ = true; \
- } \
+ current_ctx_ = ctx_; \
} else { \
assert(qemu_get_current_aio_context() == \
qemu_get_aio_context()); \
- while ((cond)) { \
- aio_poll(qemu_get_aio_context(), true); \
- waited_ = true; \
+ current_ctx_ = qemu_get_aio_context(); \
+ } \
+ if (timeout_ > 0) { \
+ timer_init_full(&timer_, ¤t_ctx_->tlg, \
+ QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME, \
+ SCALE_NS, 0, aio_wait_timer_cb, NULL); \
+ timer_mod_ns(&timer_, \
+ qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME) + \
+ timeout_); \
+ } \
+ while ((cond)) { \
+ aio_poll(current_ctx_, true); \
+ if (timeout_ > 0 && !timer_pending(&timer_)) { \
+ ret_ = -ETIMEDOUT; \
+ break; \
} \
} \
+ if (timeout_ > 0) { \
+ timer_del(&timer_); \
+ } \
qatomic_dec(&wait_->num_waiters); \
- waited_; })
+ ret_; })
#define AIO_WAIT_WHILE(ctx, cond) \
- AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL(ctx, cond)
+ AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(ctx, cond, 0)
/* TODO replace this with AIO_WAIT_WHILE() in a future patch */
#define AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED(ctx, cond) \
- AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL(ctx, cond)
+ AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(ctx, cond, 0)
/**
* aio_wait_kick:
@@ -149,4 +168,6 @@ static inline bool in_aio_context_home_thread(AioContext *ctx)
}
}
+void aio_wait_timer_cb(void *opaque);
+
#endif /* QEMU_AIO_WAIT_H */
diff --git a/include/block/block-io.h b/include/block/block-io.h
index b49e0537dd..844e9cf350 100644
--- a/include/block/block-io.h
+++ b/include/block/block-io.h
@@ -354,6 +354,11 @@ bdrv_co_copy_range(BdrvChild *src, int64_t src_offset,
AIO_WAIT_WHILE(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs_), \
cond); })
+#define BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(bs, cond, timeout_ns) ({ \
+ BlockDriverState *bs_ = (bs); \
+ AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs_), \
+ cond, timeout_ns); })
+
void bdrv_drain(BlockDriverState *bs);
int co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock
@@ -432,7 +437,22 @@ bdrv_drain_poll(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *ignore_parent,
void bdrv_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs);
/**
- * bdrv_do_drained_begin_quiesce:
+ * bdrv_drained_begin_timeout:
+ *
+ * Added timeout parameter for bdrv_drained_begin() to make a time limited.
+ *
+ * @timeout_ns: maximum duration to wait; 0 means infinite, equal to call
+ * bdrv_drained_begin().
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if succeeded; -ETIMEDOUT when a timeout occurs.
+ *
+ * Note: when the timeout fails, we've already begin aquiesced section, so we
+ * still need to call bdrv_drained_end() to end the quiescent section.
+ */
+int bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t timeout_ns);
+
+/**
+ * bdrv_do_drained_badegin_quiesce:
*
* Quiesces a BDS like bdrv_drained_begin(), but does not wait for already
* running requests to complete.
diff --git a/util/aio-wait.c b/util/aio-wait.c
index b5336cf5fd..64c3714fb8 100644
--- a/util/aio-wait.c
+++ b/util/aio-wait.c
@@ -84,3 +84,8 @@ void aio_wait_bh_oneshot(AioContext *ctx, QEMUBHFunc *cb, void *opaque)
aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(ctx, aio_wait_bh, &data);
AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED(NULL, !data.done);
}
+
+void aio_wait_timer_cb(void *opaque)
+{
+ /* The point is to make AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT()'s aio_poll() return */
+}
--
2.33.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-26 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement a timeout mechanism zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-26 9:26 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-26 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-12 9:40 ` Michael Tokarev
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-03-26 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
to occur.
Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
its execution duration.
The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
---
block/block-backend.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
block/qapi-system.c | 10 +++++++++-
include/system/block-backend-global-state.h | 1 +
qapi/block-core.json | 5 ++++-
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
index a402db13f2..fc1554ea55 100644
--- a/block/block-backend.c
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
@@ -2679,20 +2679,32 @@ void blk_set_io_limits(BlockBackend *blk, ThrottleConfig *cfg)
}
void blk_io_limits_disable(BlockBackend *blk)
+{
+ blk_io_limits_disable_timeout(blk, 0);
+}
+
+int blk_io_limits_disable_timeout(BlockBackend *blk, uint64_t timeout_ns)
{
BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk);
ThrottleGroupMember *tgm = &blk->public.throttle_group_member;
+ int ret = 0;
+
assert(tgm->throttle_state);
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
if (bs) {
bdrv_ref(bs);
- bdrv_drained_begin(bs);
+ ret = bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(bs, timeout_ns);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ goto out;
+ }
}
throttle_group_unregister_tgm(tgm);
+out:
if (bs) {
bdrv_drained_end(bs);
bdrv_unref(bs);
}
+ return ret;
}
/* should be called before blk_set_io_limits if a limit is set */
diff --git a/block/qapi-system.c b/block/qapi-system.c
index 54b7409b2b..3b7ba0959c 100644
--- a/block/qapi-system.c
+++ b/block/qapi-system.c
@@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ void qmp_block_set_io_throttle(BlockIOThrottle *arg, Error **errp)
ThrottleConfig cfg;
BlockDriverState *bs;
BlockBackend *blk;
+ uint64_t timeout_ns;
blk = qmp_get_blk(arg->device, arg->id, errp);
if (!blk) {
@@ -444,6 +445,10 @@ void qmp_block_set_io_throttle(BlockIOThrottle *arg, Error **errp)
cfg.buckets[THROTTLE_OPS_READ].avg = arg->iops_rd;
cfg.buckets[THROTTLE_OPS_WRITE].avg = arg->iops_wr;
+ timeout_ns = 0; /* 0 means infinite */
+ if (arg->has_timeout) {
+ timeout_ns = arg->timeout * NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND;
+ }
if (arg->has_bps_max) {
cfg.buckets[THROTTLE_BPS_TOTAL].max = arg->bps_max;
}
@@ -502,7 +507,10 @@ void qmp_block_set_io_throttle(BlockIOThrottle *arg, Error **errp)
blk_set_io_limits(blk, &cfg);
} else if (blk_get_public(blk)->throttle_group_member.throttle_state) {
/* If all throttling settings are set to 0, disable I/O limits */
- blk_io_limits_disable(blk);
+ if (blk_io_limits_disable_timeout(blk, timeout_ns) < 0) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Blk io limits disable timeout");
+ return;
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/include/system/block-backend-global-state.h b/include/system/block-backend-global-state.h
index 35b5e8380b..8a2a6cbda4 100644
--- a/include/system/block-backend-global-state.h
+++ b/include/system/block-backend-global-state.h
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ int blk_probe_geometry(BlockBackend *blk, HDGeometry *geo);
void blk_set_io_limits(BlockBackend *blk, ThrottleConfig *cfg);
void blk_io_limits_disable(BlockBackend *blk);
+int blk_io_limits_disable_timeout(BlockBackend *blk, uint64_t timeout_ns);
void blk_io_limits_enable(BlockBackend *blk, const char *group);
void blk_io_limits_update_group(BlockBackend *blk, const char *group);
void blk_set_force_allow_inactivate(BlockBackend *blk);
diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
index b1937780e1..88ef593efd 100644
--- a/qapi/block-core.json
+++ b/qapi/block-core.json
@@ -2626,6 +2626,9 @@
#
# @group: throttle group name (Since 2.4)
#
+# @timeout: In seconds. Timeout for block_set_io_throttle,
+# 0 means no limit. Defaults to 0. (Since 10.0)
+#
# Features:
#
# @deprecated: Member @device is deprecated. Use @id instead.
@@ -2642,7 +2645,7 @@
'*bps_max_length': 'int', '*bps_rd_max_length': 'int',
'*bps_wr_max_length': 'int', '*iops_max_length': 'int',
'*iops_rd_max_length': 'int', '*iops_wr_max_length': 'int',
- '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str' } }
+ '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str', '*timeout': 'uint32'} }
##
# @ThrottleLimits:
--
2.33.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle() zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-26 9:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-27 7:56 ` zoudongjie via
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2025-03-26 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zoudongjie via
Cc: zoudongjie, stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14
zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
> From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> to occur.
>
> Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> its execution duration.
What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
>
> The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
> previous behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> index b1937780e1..88ef593efd 100644
> --- a/qapi/block-core.json
> +++ b/qapi/block-core.json
> @@ -2626,6 +2626,9 @@
> #
> # @group: throttle group name (Since 2.4)
> #
> +# @timeout: In seconds. Timeout for block_set_io_throttle,
> +# 0 means no limit. Defaults to 0. (Since 10.0)
Make that 10.1, since it won't make 10.0.
> +#
> # Features:
> #
> # @deprecated: Member @device is deprecated. Use @id instead.
> @@ -2642,7 +2645,7 @@
> '*bps_max_length': 'int', '*bps_rd_max_length': 'int',
> '*bps_wr_max_length': 'int', '*iops_max_length': 'int',
> '*iops_rd_max_length': 'int', '*iops_wr_max_length': 'int',
> - '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str' } }
> + '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str', '*timeout': 'uint32'} }
>
> ##
> # @ThrottleLimits:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long
2025-03-26 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement a timeout mechanism zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle() zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-26 15:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-12 9:40 ` Michael Tokarev
3 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2025-03-26 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zoudongjie
Cc: qemu-devel, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2110 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 05:26:32PM +0800, zoudongjie wrote:
> From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> to occur.
>
> This series add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> its execution duration.
>
> Changelog
> v3 ---
> Unify AIO_WAIT_WHILE_{TIMEOUT/INTERNAL} by replacing AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL() with
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(..., 0).
>
> v2 ----
> 1. Support 0 in BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(), 0 means infinite.
> 2. Use uint64_t timeout_ns instead of int64 timeout to name variables.
> 3. Use timer_pending() to check for expiry instead of explicitly checking
> against the deadline for BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT().
> 4. Add documentation for bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(), note that bdrv_drained_end()
> must be called when -ETIMEDOUT is returned.
> 5. Add a timeout parameter to the qmp_block_set_io_throttle() instead of hardcoding
> the timeout, and the default value is 0, mean an infinite timeout.
>
> v1 patch link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250308101618.721954-1-zoudongjie@huawei.com/
>
> Zhu Yangyang (2):
> io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement
> a timeout mechanism.
> qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
>
> block/block-backend.c | 14 ++++-
> block/io.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++----
> block/qapi-system.c | 10 +++-
> include/block/aio-wait.h | 47 ++++++++++++-----
> include/block/block-io.h | 22 +++++++-
> include/system/block-backend-global-state.h | 1 +
> qapi/block-core.json | 5 +-
> util/aio-wait.c | 5 ++
> 8 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Aside from Markus' comments:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-26 9:53 ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2025-03-27 7:56 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-27 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-03-27 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: armbru
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
>
> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
> >
> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> > to occur.
> >
> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> > its execution duration.
>
> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
The reply is:
{"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
>
> >
> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
> > previous behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> > index b1937780e1..88ef593efd 100644
> > --- a/qapi/block-core.json
> > +++ b/qapi/block-core.json
> > @@ -2626,6 +2626,9 @@
> > #
> > # @group: throttle group name (Since 2.4)
> > #
> > +# @timeout: In seconds. Timeout for block_set_io_throttle,
> > +# 0 means no limit. Defaults to 0. (Since 10.0)
>
> Make that 10.1, since it won't make 10.0.
Ok, I'll correct it in the next version.
>
> > +#
> > # Features:
> > #
> > # @deprecated: Member @device is deprecated. Use @id instead.
> > @@ -2642,7 +2645,7 @@
> > '*bps_max_length': 'int', '*bps_rd_max_length': 'int',
> > '*bps_wr_max_length': 'int', '*iops_max_length': 'int',
> > '*iops_rd_max_length': 'int', '*iops_wr_max_length': 'int',
> > - '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str' } }
> > + '*iops_size': 'int', '*group': 'str', '*timeout': 'uint32'} }
> >
> > ##
> > # @ThrottleLimits:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-27 7:56 ` zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-27 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-27 12:34 ` zoudongjie via
2025-04-01 7:21 ` zoudongjie via
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2025-03-27 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zoudongjie
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14
zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
>> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>> >
>> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
>> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
>> > to occur.
What other commands could similarly block?
>> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
>> > its execution duration.
>>
>> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
>
> The reply is:
> {"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
I find the error message confusing. Suggest "command timed out".
>> >
>> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
>> > previous behavior.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-27 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2025-03-27 12:34 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-27 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-01 7:21 ` zoudongjie via
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-03-27 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: armbru
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:04:51 +0100, Markus wrote:
> zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
> >> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
> >> >
> >> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> >> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> >> > to occur.
>
> What other commands could similarly block?
In theory, any command may be blocked if it calls bdrv_drained_begin().
I did a quick check, qmp_block_resize() could similarly block, since it called
bdrv_drained_begin(), I'm going to verify it later.
>
> >> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> >> > its execution duration.
> >>
> >> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
> >
> > The reply is:
> > {"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
>
> I find the error message confusing. Suggest "command timed out".
This message doesn't provide more details about the error, especially for developers.
How about using "command timed out: disable I/O limits"
>
> >> >
> >> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
> >> > previous behavior.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-27 12:34 ` zoudongjie via
@ 2025-03-27 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-01 8:15 ` zoudongjie via
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2025-03-27 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zoudongjie
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14
zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:04:51 +0100, Markus wrote:
>> zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
>> >> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
>> >> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
>> >> > to occur.
>>
>> What other commands could similarly block?
>
> In theory, any command may be blocked if it calls bdrv_drained_begin().
> I did a quick check, qmp_block_resize() could similarly block, since it called
> bdrv_drained_begin(), I'm going to verify it later.
Please do.
Should all these commands support time out?
>> >> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
>> >> > its execution duration.
>> >>
>> >> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
>> >
>> > The reply is:
>> > {"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
>>
>> I find the error message confusing. Suggest "command timed out".
>
> This message doesn't provide more details about the error, especially for developers.
> How about using "command timed out: disable I/O limits"
I don't get what "disable I/O limits" is trying to tell the user. Can
you explain?
>> >> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
>> >> > previous behavior.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>>
>> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-27 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-27 12:34 ` zoudongjie via
@ 2025-04-01 7:21 ` zoudongjie via
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-04-01 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: armbru
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:04:51 +0100, Markus wrote:
> zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
> >> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
> >> >
> >> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> >> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> >> > to occur.
>
> What other commands could similarly block?
In theory, any command may be blocked if it calls bdrv_drained_begin().
I did a quick check, qmp_block_resize() could similarly block, since it called
bdrv_drained_begin(), I'm going to verify it later.
>
> >> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> >> > its execution duration.
> >>
> >> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
> >
> > The reply is:
> > {"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
>
> I find the error message confusing. Suggest "command timed out".
This message doesn't provide more details about the error, especially for developers.
How about using "command timed out: disable I/O limits"
>
> >> >
> >> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
> >> > previous behavior.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
2025-03-27 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2025-04-01 8:15 ` zoudongjie via
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zoudongjie via @ 2025-04-01 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: armbru
Cc: alex.chen, chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, fam, hreitz, kwolf,
luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-devel, qemu-stable,
renxuming, stefanha, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14, zoudongjie
I'm sorry for the delay in replying.
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:43:54 +0100, Markus wrote:
> zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:04:51 +0100, Markus wrote:
> >> zoudongjie <zoudongjie@huawei.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:53:20 +0100, Markus wrote:
> >> >> zoudongjie via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> >> >> > when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> >> >> > to occur.
> >>
> >> What other commands could similarly block?
> >
> > In theory, any command may be blocked if it calls bdrv_drained_begin().
> > I did a quick check, qmp_block_resize() could similarly block, since it called
> > bdrv_drained_begin(), I'm going to verify it later.
>
> Please do.
>
> Should all these commands support time out?
Yes, I think it is.
Later in v4, I'll add timeout support for qmp_block_resize().
If I find a similar block command in the future, I'll email again.
>
> >> >> > Therefore, we add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> >> >> > its execution duration.
> >> >>
> >> >> What's the QMP reply when a block_set_io_throttle command times out?
> >> >
> >> > The reply is:
> >> > {"id":"libvirt-484","error":{"class":"GenericError","desc":"Blk io limits disable timeout"}}
> >>
> >> I find the error message confusing. Suggest "command timed out".
> >
> > This message doesn't provide more details about the error, especially for developers.
> > How about using "command timed out: disable I/O limits"
>
> I don't get what "disable I/O limits" is trying to tell the user. Can
> you explain?
In fact, block_set_io_throttle() has two branches: enable io limits
and disable io limits. If there is a possibility of timeout in both
branches in command, detailed reason may be useful. But now "command timed out"
is enough and I will use it in v4.
>
> >> >> > The default value of timeout is 0, that is infinite wait, consistent with
> >> >> > previous behavior.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> [...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long
2025-03-26 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long zoudongjie via
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-03-26 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2025-05-12 9:40 ` Michael Tokarev
2025-05-12 10:31 ` Markus Armbruster
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2025-05-12 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zoudongjie, qemu-devel
Cc: stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen, chenjianfei3,
eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block, qemu-stable,
renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122, yebiaoxiang,
zhuyangyang14
On 26.03.2025 12:26, zoudongjie via wrote:
> From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>
> Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
> when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
> to occur.
>
> This series add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
> its execution duration.
>
> Changelog
> v3 ---
> Unify AIO_WAIT_WHILE_{TIMEOUT/INTERNAL} by replacing AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL() with
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(..., 0).
>
> v2 ----
> 1. Support 0 in BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(), 0 means infinite.
> 2. Use uint64_t timeout_ns instead of int64 timeout to name variables.
> 3. Use timer_pending() to check for expiry instead of explicitly checking
> against the deadline for BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT().
> 4. Add documentation for bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(), note that bdrv_drained_end()
> must be called when -ETIMEDOUT is returned.
> 5. Add a timeout parameter to the qmp_block_set_io_throttle() instead of hardcoding
> the timeout, and the default value is 0, mean an infinite timeout.
>
> v1 patch link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250308101618.721954-1-zoudongjie@huawei.com/
>
> Zhu Yangyang (2):
> io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement
> a timeout mechanism.
> qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
Hi!
Is this series still relevant? It's Cc'ed qemu-stable@, but not yet
applied to master branch..
Thanks,
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long
2025-05-12 9:40 ` Michael Tokarev
@ 2025-05-12 10:31 ` Markus Armbruster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2025-05-12 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Tokarev
Cc: zoudongjie, qemu-devel, stefanha, kwolf, fam, hreitz, alex.chen,
chenjianfei3, eric.fangyi, luolongmin, mujinsheng, qemu-block,
qemu-stable, renxuming, suxiaodong1, wangjian161, wangyan122,
yebiaoxiang, zhuyangyang14
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> writes:
> On 26.03.2025 12:26, zoudongjie via wrote:
>> From: Zhu Yangyang <zhuyangyang14@huawei.com>
>> Calling qmp_block_set_io_throttle() will be blocked for a long time
>> when a network disk is configured and the network failure is just about
>> to occur.
>> This series add a timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle to control
>> its execution duration.
>> Changelog
>> v3 ---
>> Unify AIO_WAIT_WHILE_{TIMEOUT/INTERNAL} by replacing AIO_WAIT_WHILE_INTERNAL() with
>> AIO_WAIT_WHILE_TIMEOUT(..., 0).
>> v2 ----
>> 1. Support 0 in BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT(), 0 means infinite.
>> 2. Use uint64_t timeout_ns instead of int64 timeout to name variables.
>> 3. Use timer_pending() to check for expiry instead of explicitly checking
>> against the deadline for BDRV_POLL_WHILE_TIMEOUT().
>> 4. Add documentation for bdrv_drained_begin_timeout(), note that bdrv_drained_end()
>> must be called when -ETIMEDOUT is returned.
>> 5. Add a timeout parameter to the qmp_block_set_io_throttle() instead of hardcoding
>> the timeout, and the default value is 0, mean an infinite timeout.
>> v1 patch link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250308101618.721954-1-zoudongjie@huawei.com/
>> Zhu Yangyang (2):
>> io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement
>> a timeout mechanism.
>> qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle()
>
> Hi!
>
> Is this series still relevant? It's Cc'ed qemu-stable@, but not yet
> applied to master branch..
I understand Zoudongjie intends to respin.
Issues I pointed out:
* Incorrect Since: tag
* Confusing error message
* What other commands could similarly block?
The last one should be investigated, but that need not block the patch.
A partial fix can be better than no fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-12 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-26 9:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] io/block: Refactoring the bdrv_drained_begin() function and implement a timeout mechanism zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] qapi/throttle: add timeout parameter for qmp_block_set_io_throttle() zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 9:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-27 7:56 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-27 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-03-27 12:34 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-27 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-01 8:15 ` zoudongjie via
2025-04-01 7:21 ` zoudongjie via
2025-03-26 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] qapi/throttle: Fix qmp_block_set_io_throttle blocked for too long Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-05-12 9:40 ` Michael Tokarev
2025-05-12 10:31 ` Markus Armbruster
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.