From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
hyeonggon.yoo@sk.com, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
honggyu.kim@sk.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Weighted interleave auto-tuning
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:37:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734hbiq7j.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4_782yoMKqIOfW5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (Gregory Price's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:56:35 -0500")
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 07:17:15PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> ... snip ...
>>
>> Unless it's possible we will add more modes in the future, this is kind
>> of overkill for me. How about something simpler as below?
>>
>> $ cat auto
>> true
>> $ echo 0 > auto
>> $ cat auto
>> false
>
> We have discussed having a dynamic-mode where the weights might adjust
> on the fly based on system-state, but i think this ends up being
> controlled under mempolicy/dynamic_interleave or something.
>
> So this seems reasonable.
>
>> > static u8 __rcu *iw_table;
>> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(iw_table_lock);
>> > +static const int weightiness = 32;
>> > +static bool weighted_interleave_auto = true;
>>
>> I still prefer to use 2 iw_table, one is for default, the other is for
>> manual. The default one will be used if the manual one is NULL. Both
>> are protected by RCU. The default one can be updated upon hotplug
>> blindly. This makes the whole model easier to be understood IMHO.
>>
>> What do you think about that.
>>
>
> only question is, lets say you have
>
> `cat auto node0 node1` -> `true 5 1`
> and you do
> echo 0 > auto
>
> what should a subsequent `cat auto node0 node1` output?
>
> `false 5 1`
> or
> `false 1 1`
IMO, it should be
`false 5 1`
That is, we copy auto-generated weights to manual weights atomically and
use it.
> Then lets say we do
> echo 7 > node0
Now, `cat auto node0 node1` outputs,
`false 7 1`
That is, we delete manual weights and use the auto-generated ones.
> what should
> echo true > auto
> result in?
>
> `true 5 1`
> or
> `true 7 1`
It should be
`true 5 1`
> The current code makes sure that when you switch modes from auto
> to manual, it inherits the current state - instead of there being
> some hidden state that suddenly takes precedence.
I think that we can do that with two weight arrays.
> So I prefer to just have one IW array and no hidden state.
Then, when we switch from manual to auto mode, where to find
auto-generated weights? Re-calculate them?
---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 18:58 [PATCH v3] Weighted interleave auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-01-20 4:47 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2025-01-21 21:24 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-01-21 11:17 ` Huang, Ying
2025-01-21 11:27 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-01-21 20:02 ` Gregory Price
2025-01-22 1:24 ` Huang, Ying
2025-02-05 5:34 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-01-21 19:56 ` Gregory Price
2025-01-22 1:37 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2025-01-22 15:59 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-01-22 16:53 ` Gregory Price
2025-01-23 3:32 ` Huang, Ying
2025-01-24 5:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-24 15:48 ` Gregory Price
2025-01-24 15:53 ` Gregory Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734hbiq7j.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA \
--to=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
--cc=hyeonggon.yoo@sk.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.