From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6103F9C0 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709564625; cv=none; b=tXSO+UGwu+k/vNtLjuMfbNsWxYG3L24XNIr5xXxq+/7emMJRmo5UdtrI16R7J3zL7B3UMvzoYv4B8gQbvggHohTDg3haiw2kOtFfTky3XpyL1QN3d9WBw0xhXoeXlF2Yh51Vx8EVMYnvWF/SozLcOJuY9EO/6FiNAWfUZbYEkw8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709564625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WQGQ27mX80efnKaDnp/B9HWNqMMcFRihUMuvEC5ETXw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uCmz29e2CUq5BBzNdh6EkYtmGJ7BOIY4bOo/M/OnZDRwY/JFRjT1t3q9arTH8fAmFUZj7EzBbxYq+k8/zY1Jsgk5y81cMKrGdZ+IG3joUlX604M+5dWFffdT5QqMgvPlnKexK9KIZ7yzm0A1YuAk0nqeZYOcWeUSJENRxa29zQA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IpyT2ep5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IpyT2ep5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E269C433F1; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:03:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709564625; bh=WQGQ27mX80efnKaDnp/B9HWNqMMcFRihUMuvEC5ETXw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IpyT2ep5fKlrHz1Zwj6I79qS47B2R0XE7lpq2xOWh6z/sKpZ0yRfm9d6VYUQplSre jtdSu6U40ELisDVIkA6t94GrR32aWR3TR99IR6Msenoenuisy2otjFsrSihJUoMLlG +6rM7smsnvbDa3Wg/8L6MWSF/yH19nPigciAKAYvWh+WUzgtvabRmBxcet2W1cBojE Pu4Ujs/77Ptl8H4dEuHEA8nj3PMfuEAp8T0X8b2RBXguufMB2KLM1BkZdN16Weri3B zfk1HVwPbRHRftxVED8TEMq4D7OmIgO80Y9LDMP4O4zcCAGjzybuGI5+8R4mGn5FuU hzKcDE7fsrAGg== From: Kalle Valo To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ilan Peer , Miriam Rachel Korenblit Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Adjust CQM handling for MLO References: <20240228094753.bf6a3fefe553.Id738810b73e1087e01d5885508b70a3631707627@changeid> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:03:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240228094753.bf6a3fefe553.Id738810b73e1087e01d5885508b70a3631707627@changeid> (Johannes Berg's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:47:54 +0100") Message-ID: <8734t682er.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Johannes Berg writes: > From: Ilan Peer > > The CQM handling did not consider the MLO case and thus notified > a not-existing link with the CQM change. To fix this, propagate > the CQM notification to all the active links (handling both the > non-MLO and MLO cases). > > TODO: this currently propagates the same configuration to all > links regardless of the band. This might not be the correct > approach as different links might need to be configured with > different values. Is that TODO link there intentionally? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches