From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8DA7E6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 06:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: philippe.gerum@sourcetrek.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B41E24000A; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 06:56:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenomai.org; s=gm1; t=1655708179; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=delPbWRZpzeuWeECaAAJmU3g0Fy8dhNnhN5+3V/Wgvc=; b=jW7OSWGkHll8+hC7/ICJJ+ae1pMq+u9cx0ZpdiGvPpPNUe362ezfJ9RNHVnR+affzWWx9q K0nnram/RGOeKRN9AP+Pp+zwryc8Y7Nr3rl+r9ZVUuK27zYSV3C/Y4VqWAMxXg13HpTKu5 xgtb1+5A6WvHQenL+It/uw/SFiul/Y7U9n+f58pFNZ4Cc5IBj347VvMNbly1AB0GsKJGCR BmTT/KoUJxwL8WbYA/OKm9dc7SUq19rFJn1RIJqVbcSsVevbg5o7k+TipeDVMMMxSiisqv P+SzdV/ZAKxqzKYs1AOyQ93wLFMLO/3TYVohdFLHDLeitfDe5SvTx+PwcHoA+w== References: <875yky6idl.fsf@xenomai.org> <30615b27-e696-2000-b484-e6433379fa2a@siemens.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.6; emacs 27.2 From: Philippe Gerum To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: Mailing list enabled Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:52:40 +0200 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <8735fzkelp.fsf@xenomai.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: xenomai@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jan Kiszka writes: > On 20.06.22 08:13, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 18.06.22 18:11, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> >>> The mailing list rehosting process is complete, welcome back. >>> >>> Unlike I previously announced, it looks like keeping xenomai@xenomai.org >>> available for posting to this list via mail forwarding is not going to >>> be possible. So please switch to xenomai@lists.linux.dev for this >>> purpose, the information on the website has been updated accordingly. >> >> Fairly inconvenient. What prevents this? >> >> Did you already updated the ipipe release script accordingly? Just >> pushed a 5.4 release, and it seems the announcement is not making it. >> >> Thanks, >> Jan >> > > Another question in this context: Will it be possible to migrate the > archive? Would allow to retrieve the whole history from one source. > Yes, this is planned. -- Philippe.