Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] migration/ram: Handle RAMBlocks with a RamDiscardManager on the migration source

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> We don't want to migrate memory that corresponds to discarded ranges as
> managed by a RamDiscardManager responsible for the mapped memory region of
> the RAMBlock. The content of these pages is essentially stale and
> without any guarantees for the VM ("logically unplugged").
>
> Depending on the underlying memory type, even reading memory might populate
> memory on the source, resulting in an undesired memory consumption. Of
> course, on the destination, even writing a zeropage consumes memory,
> which we also want to avoid (similar to free page hinting).
>
> Currently, virtio-mem tries achieving that goal (not migrating "unplugged"
> memory that was discarded) by going via qemu_guest_free_page_hint() - but
> it's hackish and incomplete.
>
> For example, background snapshots still end up reading all memory, as
> they don't do bitmap syncs. Postcopy recovery code will re-add
> previously cleared bits to the dirty bitmap and migrate them.
>
> Let's consult the RamDiscardManager after setting up our dirty bitmap
> initially and when postcopy recovery code reinitializes it: clear
> corresponding bits in the dirty bitmaps (e.g., of the RAMBlock and inside
> KVM). It's important to fixup the dirty bitmap *after* our initial bitmap
> sync, such that the corresponding dirty bits in KVM are actually cleared.
>
> As colo is incompatible with discarding of RAM and inhibits it, we don't
> have to bother.
>
> Note: if a misbehaving guest would use discarded ranges after migration
> started we would still migrate that memory: however, then we already
> populated that memory on the migration source.
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>