All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, wrampazz@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, crosa@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mreitz@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] replay: implement replay-seek command
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:10:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87363sr0b9.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z8or5qy.fsf@linaro.org>


Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:

> Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru> writes:
>
>> On 07.09.2020 19:25, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> 
>>> Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru> writes:
>>> 
>>>> On 07.09.2020 17:59, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07.09.2020 15:58, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch adds hmp/qmp commands replay_seek/replay-seek that proceed
>>>>>>>> the execution to the specified instruction count.
>>>>>>>> The command automatically loads nearest snapshot and replays the execution
>>>>>>>> to find the desired instruction count.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should there be an initial snapshot created at instruction 0? Using a
>>>>>>> separate monitor channel:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right, you can't go to the prior state, when there is no preceding
>>>>>> snapshot available.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems creating an initial snapshot automatically would be more user
>>>>
>>>> Please take a look at 'Snapshotting' section of docs/replay.txt.
>>>> Reverse debugging is considered to be run with disk image (overlay)
>>>> and rrsnapshot option of icount, which allows creating an initial
>>>> VM snapshot.
>>> 
>>> Given that I'm using the block device purely for VM snapshots I think it
>>> would be useful to document the minimal "no disk" approach - i.e. where
>>> the disk is only used for record/replay.
>>> 
>>> However I'm still having trouble. I can record the trace with:
>>> 
>>>    ./qemu-system-aarch64 -cpu cortex-a53 -display none -serial stdio \
>>>      -machine virt -kernel zephyr.elf -net none \
>>>      -icount shift=6,align=off,sleep=off,rr=record,rrfile=record.out,rrsnapshot=rrstart  \
>>>      -drive file=record.qcow2,if=none,id=rr \
>>>      -monitor telnet:127.0.0.1:4444 -S
>>
>> Can you provide your zephyr.elf image?
>>
>>> 
>>> which shows:
>>> 
>>>    (qemu) info snapshots
>>>    info snapshots
>>>    List of snapshots present on all disks:
>>>    ID        TAG               VM SIZE                DATE     VM CLOCK     ICOUNT
>>>    --        rrstart           653 KiB 2020-09-07 17:12:42 00:00:00.000          0
>>> 
>>> but do I need a whole separate overlay in the replay case? I thought
>>> supplying snapshot to the drive would prevent the replay case
>>> overwriting what has been recorded but with:
>>> 
>>>      -icount shift=6,align=off,sleep=off,rr=replay,rrfile=record.out \
>>>      -drive file=record.qcow2,if=none,id=rr,snapshot
>>
>> When you provide qcow2 (overlay or not) for snapshotting, you don't need 
>> any 'snapshot' option on drive.
>>
>>> 
>>> but I get:
>>> 
>>>    (qemu) info snapshots
>>>    info snapshots
>>>    There is no snapshot available.
>>> 
>>> so if I drop the ,snapshot from the line I can at least see the snapshot
>>> but continue doesn't seem to work:
>>> 
>>>    (qemu) info snapshots
>>>    info snapshots
>>>    List of snapshots present on all disks:
>>>    ID        TAG               VM SIZE                DATE     VM CLOCK     ICOUNT
>>>    --        rrstart           653 KiB 2020-09-07 17:12:42 00:00:00.000          0
>>>    (qemu) replay_break 190505
>>>    replay_break 190505
>>>    (qemu) c
>>>    c
>>>    (qemu) info replay
>>>    info replay
>>>    Replaying execution 'record.out': instruction count = 0
>>
>> It seems, that replay hangs. Can you try removing '-S' in record command 
>> line?
>
> That doesn't make any difference removing from both the record and
> replay cases. It seems to need a loadvm to start things off.
>
> I've sent you an image off list. Please let me know if you can
> replicate.

OK I can successfully use gdb to reverse debug the acceptance test (\o/)
so I suspect there are differences in the calling setup.

The first one is ensuring that rrsnapshot is set for both record and
replay. For this reason I think a more user friendly automatic snapshot
would be worth setting up when record/replay is being used.

-icount sleep=off definitely breaks things. Do we keep track of the
 icount bias as save and restore state?

-- 
Alex Bennée


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-02  8:15 [PATCH v3 00/15] Reverse debugging Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] replay: don't record interrupt poll Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 10:17   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-02  8:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] replay: provide an accessor for rr filename Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] qcow2: introduce icount field for snapshots Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] migration: " Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] iotests: update snapshot test for new output format Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 15:26   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-07 15:41     ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 16:00       ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-07 16:05         ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08 13:10   ` Eric Blake
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] qapi: introduce replay.json for record/replay-related stuff Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] replay: introduce info hmp/qmp command Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] replay: introduce breakpoint at the specified step Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] replay: implement replay-seek command Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 12:45   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-07 13:32     ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 12:58   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-07 13:27     ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 14:59       ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-07 15:46         ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 16:25           ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-08  7:44             ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08  9:13               ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-08 10:57                 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08 11:10                 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2020-09-08 12:15                   ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08 10:54             ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] replay: flush rr queue before loading the vmstate Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 13:37   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] gdbstub: add reverse step support in replay mode Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-07 16:30   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-08 11:16   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-02  8:16 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] gdbstub: add reverse continue " Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] replay: describe reverse debugging in docs/replay.txt Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08 11:27   ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-08 12:57     ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02  8:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] tests: bump avocado version Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-02 17:02   ` Willian Rampazzo
2020-09-04 21:39   ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-02  8:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] tests/acceptance: add reverse debugging test Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-09-08 13:01   ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87363sr0b9.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.