From: "Aurélien Aptel" <aaptel@suse.com>
To: "Björn JACKE" <bj@SerNet.DE>, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cifs multiuser mode and per session treatment
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 12:38:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736dkv6ub.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213121452.GA12253@sernet.de>
Hi Björn,
Björn JACKE <bj@SerNet.DE> writes:
> cifs.upcall might need some tuning to make use of a session keyring but even if
> that would be done, there is still one important limitation left to solve: cifs
IIRC cifs.upcall uses the session keyring already.
> multiuser SMB connections should also be initiated per session, same like the
> keyring. Currently the cifs SMB connections are accessible also from other all
> sessions.
That needs to be implemented indeed.
> For example if I kinit a ticket, access a multiuser cifs mount successfully (so
> that the smb session is initiated), then kdestroy my ticket, log in to the
> machine again to open a new session, and then access the multiuser cifs mount
> from there, this is currently successful. For a cifs multiuser mount with per
> session limitation, this access should be denied accordingly.
I think I understood.
In terms of implementation each cifs mount stores a dictionnary mapping
uid to TreeCon (it's the tlink rb-tree, see cifs_sb_tlink(),
tlink_rb_search(), etc).
I think it should just be a matter of storing the session id as the key
in the tlink rb-tree instead of uid (we use fsuid actually). This way
when a new session does a syscall on the mount, the lookup will fail, it
will try to create a new tlink, and fail unless there is the krb stuff
in the keyring.
But are you sure root cannot "enter" an existing user session? I think
I've done it for screen sessions in the past... If yes, would this make
this per-session smb session pointless or is there still some value?
Cheers,
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-16 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-13 12:14 cifs multiuser mode and per session treatment Björn JACKE
2019-12-16 11:38 ` Aurélien Aptel [this message]
2019-12-17 10:07 ` Björn JACKE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736dkv6ub.fsf@suse.com \
--to=aaptel@suse.com \
--cc=bj@SerNet.DE \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.