From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: added i2c symlink to hdmi connector
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:37:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736l9a856.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517162109.2319-1-oleg.vasilev@intel.com>
On Fri, 17 May 2019, Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently, the i2c adapter was available only under DP connectors.
Currently ... is?
> This patch adds i2c adapter symlink to hdmi connector in order to make
> this behaviour consistent.
Please don't refer to "this patch" in commit messages. Please use
imperative style, here as well as in the subject:
"drm/i915: add i2c symlink to hdmi connector"
"Add i2c adapter symlink to hdmi connector in order to make this
behaviour consistent."
I understand what you mean, but "add i2c symlink to hdmi connector"
could be read as having a symlink point at the connector. Perhaps, "Add
symlink from hdmi connector to i2c adapter in order to make this
behaviour consistent."
> The initial motivation of this patch was to make igt i2c subtest
> patch [1] work on all connectors.
>
> [1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60357/
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev@intel.com>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
It's probably more common to add Cc's before the Signed-off-by.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> index 2a4086cf2692..b8ae67297878 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> @@ -2658,6 +2658,37 @@ static void chv_hdmi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> chv_phy_release_cl2_override(encoder);
> }
>
> +static struct i2c_adapter *
> +intel_hdmi_get_i2c_adapter(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = intel_attached_encoder(connector);
> + struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi = enc_to_intel_hdmi(&intel_encoder->base);
> + struct drm_device *dev = intel_encoder->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->dev);
struct intel_hdmi *intel_hdmi = intel_attached_hdmi(connector);
> +
> + return intel_gmbus_get_adapter(dev_priv, intel_hdmi->ddc_bus);
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_hdmi_create_i2c_symlink(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = intel_hdmi_get_i2c_adapter(connector);
> + struct kobject *i2c_kobj = &adapter->dev.kobj;
> + struct kobject *connector_kobj = &connector->kdev->kobj;
> +
> + int ret = sysfs_create_link(connector_kobj, i2c_kobj, i2c_kobj->name);
Please keep declarations and initialization separate for all non-trivial
initialization.
> +
> + WARN(ret != 0, "Failed to create i2c symlink\n");
sysfs_create_link already warns when -EEXIST, and anyway I think a WARN
is a bit much. DRM_ERROR perhaps.
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_hdmi_delete_i2c_symlink(struct drm_connector *connector)
Perhaps follow sysfs_remove_link naming? I.e. remove instead of delete.
> +{
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = intel_hdmi_get_i2c_adapter(connector);
> + struct kobject *i2c_kobj = &adapter->dev.kobj;
> + struct kobject *connector_kobj = &connector->kdev->kobj;
> +
> + sysfs_remove_link(connector_kobj, i2c_kobj->name);
> +}
> +
> static int
> intel_hdmi_connector_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> @@ -2669,11 +2700,15 @@ intel_hdmi_connector_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>
> i915_debugfs_connector_add(connector);
>
> + intel_hdmi_create_i2c_symlink(connector);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> static void intel_hdmi_destroy(struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> + intel_hdmi_delete_i2c_symlink(connector);
What Ville said.
BR,
Jani.
> +
> if (intel_attached_hdmi(connector)->cec_notifier)
> cec_notifier_put(intel_attached_hdmi(connector)->cec_notifier);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 16:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: added i2c symlink to hdmi connector Oleg Vasilev
2019-05-17 16:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-05-17 17:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2019-05-20 7:37 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-05-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: add i2c symlink under " Oleg Vasilev
2019-05-20 14:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: added i2c symlink to hdmi connector (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-20 14:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736l9a856.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oleg.vasilev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.