All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND \(UWB\) SUBSYSTEM:"
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: usb: dwc3: of-simple: fix use-after-free on remove
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:05:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736xhwwer.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
>>> * Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> [180619 01:23]:
>>>> This is a direct consequence of not paying attention to the order of
>>>> things. If driver were to assume that pm_domain->activate() would do the
>>>> right thing for the device -- meaning that probe would run with an
>>>> active device --, then we wouldn't need that pm_runtime_get() call on
>>>> probe at all. Rather we would follow the sequence:
>>>>
>>>>      pm_runtime_forbid()
>
> Why do you need the _forbid() thing?
>
> Does the default user space control setting need to be changed?

wouldn't that race with a udev rule writing "auto" power/control as soon
as device is added?

>>>> (If you need to know why the pm_runtime_put_noidle(), remember that
>>>> pm_runtime_set_active() increments the usage counter, so
>>>> pm_runtime_put_noidle is basically allowing pm_runtime to happen as soon
>>>> as userspace writes "auto" to /sys/..../power/control)
>>>
>>> I wonder if we could also remove the need for drivers to call
>>> pm_runtime_putnoidle() at the end of the probe? If we had
>>> pm_runtime_init_enabled() implemented.
>>
>> probably not. We want to block runtime pm during probe, until the device
>> is fully initialized, the only way to do that is to increment rpm usage
>> counter.
>
> That or enable it only at the end.  But I guess you want to
> runtime-resume it earlier, don't you?

well, if arch implements pm_domain->activate() and guarantees that
device is already running, with clocks stable during probe, then
enabling runtime pm at the end is probably the best idea.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-20 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-20 11:05 Felipe Balbi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-21 15:15 usb: dwc3: of-simple: fix use-after-free on remove Alan Stern
2018-06-21 10:11 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21  9:52 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21  8:27 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21  8:17 Roger Quadros
2018-06-20 22:55 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 22:32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 15:46 Johan Hovold
2018-06-20 12:54 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 12:23 Johan Hovold
2018-06-20 12:17 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20  9:54 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20  9:27 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-20  9:16 Tony Lindgren
2018-06-20  4:34 Tony Lindgren
2018-06-19 12:10 Tero Kristo
2018-06-19  8:18 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 14:32 Roger Quadros
2018-06-18 12:21 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 11:11 Roger Quadros
2018-06-18  9:51 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18  9:47 Johan Hovold
2018-06-18  9:33 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18  8:34 Johan Hovold
2018-06-18  8:15 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-13 10:59 Johan Hovold
2018-06-13  9:39 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-13  8:34 Roger Quadros
2018-06-13  8:05 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-13  7:49 Roger Quadros
2018-05-31 14:58 Johan Hovold
2018-05-31 14:45 Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8736xhwwer.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.