From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egseU-0004XI-9n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:42:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egseP-0004nJ-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:42:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egseP-0004mt-Ez for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:42:09 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20180122120351.22369-1-f4bug@amsat.org> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:42:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180122120351.22369-1-f4bug@amsat.org> ("Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:03:44 -0300") Message-ID: <87372m5ems.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] qdev: remove DeviceClass::init/exit() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: > since v1: > - fix format string on 32-bit host (patchew) > - do not add smbus_eeprom_reset() (Eduardo) > - directly use DeviceClass::realize (Eduardo) > - squashed 2 patches (Eduardo) > > Hi, > > This series finalize the qdev QOMification. Awesome! It's been almost nine years since qdev, and more than 7 since QOM. Sadly, I don't have the time to review this closely right now. > We first convert the I2CSlave/SMBusDevice, > then the usb-ccid and virtio-ccw, > and finally the SysBusDevice. > > At the end we get one less TODO :) > > /* TODO remove, once users are converted to unrealize */ > > There is still one standing in SysBusDeviceClass::init(). Another one in ssi_sd_realize(), I think. I didn't really look for more.