All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netfilter: call synchronize_net only once from nf_register_net_hooks
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:30:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737569yi7.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122115659.GH24866@breakpoint.cc> (Florian Westphal's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:56:59 +0100")

Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> writes:

> However, I suggest you try to go with call_rcu to get rid of all of the
> synchronize_net() calls. I don't even see why its still needed for
> nfqueue case provided we invoke the nfqueue drop handler first.
>
> PoC example, untested:

thanks, the patch seems to work for me, at least the problem I was
seeing before is now fixed.

Is there any reason for defining "struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head"?

I've used this fixup patch and it works as well.  As someone new to the
code, I find it a bit easier to follow:


diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter.h b/include/linux/netfilter.h
index c08fd706d9c7..663046776def 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter.h
@@ -77,12 +77,8 @@ struct nf_hook_entry {
 	void				*priv;
 };
 
-struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head {
-	struct rcu_head head;
-	void            *allocation;
-};
-
 struct nf_hook_entries {
+	struct rcu_head                 head;
 	u16				num_hook_entries;
 	/* padding */
 	struct nf_hook_entry		hooks[];
diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
index 1f25c914f6e9..6bcf90948810 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -69,59 +69,34 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nf_hook_mutex);
 #define nf_entry_dereference(e) \
 	rcu_dereference_protected(e, lockdep_is_held(&nf_hook_mutex))
 
-static struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head *
-nf_hook_entries_rcu_head_get(struct nf_hook_entries *e)
-{
-	unsigned int num = e->num_hook_entries;
-	struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head *head;
-	static struct nf_hook_ops **ops;
-
-        ops = nf_hook_entries_get_hook_ops(e);
-        head = (void *)&ops[num];
-
-	return head;
-}
-
 static struct nf_hook_entries *allocate_hook_entries_size(u16 num)
 {
 	struct nf_hook_entries *e;
 	size_t alloc = sizeof(*e) +
 		       sizeof(struct nf_hook_entry) * num +
-		       sizeof(struct nf_hook_ops *) * num +
-		       sizeof(struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head);
+		       sizeof(struct nf_hook_ops *) * num;
 
 	if (num == 0)
 		return NULL;
 
 	e = kvzalloc(alloc, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (e) {
-		struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head *head;
-
 		e->num_hook_entries = num;
-
-		head = nf_hook_entries_rcu_head_get(e);
-		head->allocation = e;
 	}
 	return e;
 }
 
 void __nf_hook_entries_free(struct rcu_head *h)
 {
-	struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head *head;
+	struct nf_hook_entries *entries;
 
-	head = container_of(h, struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head, head);
-	kvfree(head->allocation);
+	entries = container_of(h, struct nf_hook_entries, head);
+	kvfree(entries);
 }
 
 void nf_hook_entries_free_rcu(struct nf_hook_entries *e)
 {
-	struct nf_hook_entries_rcu_head *head;
-
-	head = nf_hook_entries_rcu_head_get(e);
-	if (WARN_ON(e != head->allocation))
-		return;
-
-	call_rcu(&head->head, __nf_hook_entries_free);
+	call_rcu(&e->head, __nf_hook_entries_free);
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22 10:40 [RFC PATCH] netfilter: call synchronize_net only once from nf_register_net_hooks Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-11-22 10:41 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-22 11:06 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-22 11:10   ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-22 11:25   ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2017-11-22 11:56     ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-22 14:30       ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2017-11-22 14:54         ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8737569yi7.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.