From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7zMk-0005mO-Nn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 03:15:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7zMj-0004HG-P6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 03:15:26 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20170427215821.19397-1-eblake@redhat.com> <20170427215821.19397-7-eblake@redhat.com> <87a871nd7j.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 09:14:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alberto Garcia's message of "Mon, 08 May 2017 16:48:30 +0200") Message-ID: <8737ce33io.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] qobject: Use simpler QDict/QList scalar insertion macros List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alberto Garcia Cc: Eric Blake , Kevin Wolf , Josh Durgin , Stefano Stabellini , Fam Zheng , Michael Roth , "open list:Block layer core" , "Richard W.M. Jones" , Stefan Weil , Jeff Cody , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Peter Lieven , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Anthony Perard , "open list:X86" , Max Reitz , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Richard Henderson Alberto Garcia writes: > On Fri 28 Apr 2017 10:33:36 AM CEST, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> v5: rebase to master (Coccinelle found a couple new spots), squash 3 >>> patches into 1, adjust R-b to only list Markus (while there were other >>> reviews on the pre-squashed patches, Markus was the only one on all 3) >> >> The block: part had >> >> Acked-by: Richard W.M. Jones >> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi >> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia >> >> The tests and qobject parts had >> >> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 >> >> Richard, Stefan, Alberto, Philippe, let me know if you'd like me to >> convert your R-by of parts to an Acked-by of the combined patch. Feel >> free to review the combined patch, of course. > > You can keep my R-by, I just reviewed the combined patch. Done. Thanks!