From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:35:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737mkq0su.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470305714-10674-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
> connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
> around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
>
> ======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Tainted: G O
> -------------------------------------------------------
> kworker/u8:0/6 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}:
> [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
> [<ffffffff819a55b4>] down_write+0x44/0x80
> [<ffffffff810abf91>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x21/0xb0
> [<ffffffff814c7448>] fb_register_client+0x18/0x20
> [<ffffffff814c6c86>] backlight_device_register+0x136/0x260
> [<ffffffffa0127eb2>] intel_backlight_device_register+0xa2/0x160 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa00f46be>] intel_connector_register+0xe/0x10 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa0112bfb>] intel_dp_connector_register+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
> [<ffffffff8159dfea>] drm_connector_register+0x4a/0x80
> [<ffffffff8159fe44>] drm_connector_register_all+0x64/0xf0
> [<ffffffff815a2a64>] drm_modeset_register_all+0x174/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff81599b72>] drm_dev_register+0xc2/0xd0
> [<ffffffffa00621d7>] i915_driver_load+0x1547/0x2200 [i915]
> [<ffffffffa006d80f>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915]
> [<ffffffff814a2135>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
> [<ffffffff814a349b>] pci_device_probe+0xdb/0x130
> [<ffffffff815c07e3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x440
> [<ffffffff815c0ad5>] __driver_attach+0xd5/0x100
> [<ffffffff815be386>] bus_for_each_dev+0x66/0xa0
> [<ffffffff815c002e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
> [<ffffffff815bf9be>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280
> [<ffffffff815c1810>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
> [<ffffffff814a1a10>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
> [<ffffffffa01a905b>] i915_init+0x5b/0x62 [i915]
> [<ffffffff8100042d>] do_one_initcall+0x3d/0x150
> [<ffffffff811a935b>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1d9
> [<ffffffff81124416>] load_module+0x20e6/0x27e0
> [<ffffffff81124d63>] SYSC_finit_module+0xc3/0xf0
> [<ffffffff81124dae>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff819a83a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
>
> -> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}:
> [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
> [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
> [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
> [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
> [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
> [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
> [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
> [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
> [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
> [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
> [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
> [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
> [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
> [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
> [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
> [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
> [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
> [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
> [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
> [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
> [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
> [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
> [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
> [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
> [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
> lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
> lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 6 locks held by kworker/u8:0/6:
> #0: ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
> #1: ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
> #2: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c8487>] register_framebuffer+0x27/0x330
> #3: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c86ce>] register_framebuffer+0x26e/0x330
> #4: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c78dd>] lock_fb_info+0x1d/0x40
> #5: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G O 4.7.0-rc5+ #524
> Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLKRVPA.X64.0138.B33.1606250842 06/25/2016
> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> 0000000000000000 ffff8800758577f0 ffffffff814507a5 ffffffff828b9900
> ffffffff828b9900 ffff880075857830 ffffffff810dc6fa ffff880075857880
> ffff88007584d688 0000000000000005 0000000000000006 ffff88007584d6b0
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff814507a5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
> [<ffffffff810dc6fa>] print_circular_bug+0x1aa/0x200
> [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
> [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
> [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
> [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
> [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
> [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
> [<ffffffff810fa85f>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x7f/0x90
> [<ffffffff81208218>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x248/0x2b0
> [<ffffffff815afdc5>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x25/0x120
> [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
> [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
> [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
> [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
> [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
> [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
> [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
> [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
> [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
> [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
> [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
> [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
> [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
> [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
> [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
> [<ffffffff815b7e8d>] ? vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set+0x5d/0x70
> [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
> [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
> [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
> [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
> [<ffffffff810a38c9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x750
> [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
> [<ffffffff810a3eb0>] ? process_one_work+0x750/0x750
> [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
> [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [<ffffffff810aac60>] ? kthread_stop+0x2e0/0x2e0
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Fixes: ?
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: a bunch of people who reported the problem upstream?
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> index ef921fa09a84..d9104d8b3c6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> @@ -401,16 +401,14 @@ int drm_connector_register_all(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> int ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> -
> - drm_for_each_connector(connector, dev) {
> + /* FIXME: taking the mode config mutex ends up in a clash with
> + * fbcon/backlight registration */
> + list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
> ret = drm_connector_register(connector);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> -
> return 0;
>
> err:
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 10:15 [PATCH] drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework Daniel Vetter
2016-08-04 10:35 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-08-04 11:12 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-08-04 16:13 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-04 16:35 Daniel Vetter
2016-08-05 8:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-08-05 9:21 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737mkq0su.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.