From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4794573186691370422=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:35:03 +0800
Message-ID: <8737tziq0o.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+7wN17Sz2JS_Z9ArC0C0TXpPa8mLM7X1j0=W3HwJhvjg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <oe-lkp.lists.linux.dev>

--===============4794573186691370422==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:05 PM, kernel test robot
> <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4=
e1073e24c0a304ce
>> commit e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce ("SUNRPC: Fixup socket w=
ait for memory")
>>
>
> Sure, this fixes the regression noticed in your other mail
> (ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec_)

Great!

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying


--===============4794573186691370422==--


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751444AbcAOBfI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:08 -0500
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:21709 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750776AbcAOBfG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:35:06 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,297,1449561600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="633672141"
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>, lkp@01.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        0day robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec
References: <8760ywx3ll.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
	<CANn89i+7wN17Sz2JS_Z9ArC0C0TXpPa8mLM7X1j0=W3HwJhvjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:35:03 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+7wN17Sz2JS_Z9ArC0C0TXpPa8mLM7X1j0=W3HwJhvjg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Eric Dumazet's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:11:56 -0800")
Message-ID: <8737tziq0o.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:05 PM, kernel test robot
> <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce
>> commit e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce ("SUNRPC: Fixup socket wait for memory")
>>
>
> Sure, this fixes the regression noticed in your other mail
> (ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec_)

Great!

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying