All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:37:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87385r3uk9.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424799222-9301-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> (Lee Jones's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:33:38 +0000")

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> writes:

> v2 => v3:
>   - Ensure DT actually reflects h/w
>     - i.e. Nodes should not contain a mishmash of different IP
>       blocks, but should identify related h/w.  In the current
>       example we use interconnects
>   - Change naming from clkdomain to clk-always-on
>   - Place "do not abuse" warning in documentation
>
> v1 => v2:
>   - Turned the ST specific driver into a generic one
>   
> Hardware can have a bunch of clocks which must not be turned off.
> If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any of these or b) give
> up a previously obtained reference during suspend, the common clk
> framework will attempt to turn them off and the hardware will
> subsequently die.  The only way to recover from this failure is to
> restart.
>   
> To avoid either of these two scenarios from catastrophically
> disabling the running system we have implemented a clock domain
> where clocks are consumed and references are taken, thus preventing
> them from being shut down by the framework.

Hi Lee,

I wonder why there is a need for a new clock when CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED does
exist. What is the usecase that is covered by this patchset which is not used by
CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED clock flag ?

And if that reason exists, I'd like to find it in the commit message.

Cheers.

--
Robert

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@linaro.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:37:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87385r3uk9.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424799222-9301-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> (Lee Jones's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:33:38 +0000")

Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> writes:

> v2 => v3:
>   - Ensure DT actually reflects h/w
>     - i.e. Nodes should not contain a mishmash of different IP
>       blocks, but should identify related h/w.  In the current
>       example we use interconnects
>   - Change naming from clkdomain to clk-always-on
>   - Place "do not abuse" warning in documentation
>
> v1 => v2:
>   - Turned the ST specific driver into a generic one
>   
> Hardware can have a bunch of clocks which must not be turned off.
> If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any of these or b) give
> up a previously obtained reference during suspend, the common clk
> framework will attempt to turn them off and the hardware will
> subsequently die.  The only way to recover from this failure is to
> restart.
>   
> To avoid either of these two scenarios from catastrophically
> disabling the running system we have implemented a clock domain
> where clocks are consumed and references are taken, thus preventing
> them from being shut down by the framework.

Hi Lee,

I wonder why there is a need for a new clock when CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED does
exist. What is the usecase that is covered by this patchset which is not used by
CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED clock flag ?

And if that reason exists, I'd like to find it in the commit message.

Cheers.

--
Robert

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-27 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-24 17:33 [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: sti: stih407-family: Supply defines for CLOCKGEN A0 Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: sti: stih407-family: Add platform interconnects to always-on clk domain Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: Provide an always-on clock domain framework Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce always-on clock domain documentation Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:33   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: st: New always-on clock domain Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-24 17:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-27 21:37 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2015-02-27 21:37   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-27 21:49   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-27 21:49     ` Lee Jones
2015-02-27 23:38     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-27 23:38       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-27 23:38       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-02  8:30       ` Lee Jones
2015-03-02  8:30         ` Lee Jones
2015-03-02 11:29         ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-02 11:29           ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-02 11:37           ` Lee Jones
2015-03-02 11:37             ` Lee Jones
2015-03-04 12:00 ` Lee Jones
2015-03-04 12:00   ` Lee Jones
2015-03-04 12:00   ` Lee Jones
2015-03-06 19:08   ` Mike Turquette
2015-03-06 19:08     ` Mike Turquette
2015-03-09  9:28     ` Lee Jones
2015-03-09  9:28       ` Lee Jones
2015-03-25  4:11       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-25  4:11         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-25  4:11         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-26 13:51         ` Lee Jones
2015-03-26 13:51           ` Lee Jones
2015-03-26 13:51           ` Lee Jones
2015-03-26 16:55           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-26 16:55             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-03-26 19:38             ` Lee Jones
2015-03-26 19:38               ` Lee Jones
2015-04-02  8:31               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02  8:31                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 10:48                 ` Lee Jones
2015-04-02 10:48                   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87385r3uk9.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.