From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbmht-0007bD-6d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:34:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbmho-0001zO-CU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:34:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xbmho-0001zH-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 04:34:44 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1411983695-7910-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <1411983695-7910-2-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <5434A6D7.50209@huawei.com> <20141008082340.GC2521@work-vm> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:34:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20141008082340.GC2521@work-vm> (David Alan Gilbert's message of "Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:23:41 +0100") Message-ID: <8738aznene.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] QEMUSizedBuffer based QEMUFile List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: joel.schopp@amd.com, zhanghailiang , stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, sanidhya.iiith@gmail.com "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" writes: > * zhanghailiang (zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com) wrote: >> On 2014/9/29 17:41, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > >> >+static ssize_t qsb_grow(QEMUSizedBuffer *qsb, size_t new_size) >> >+{ >> >+ size_t needed_chunks, i; >> >+ >> >+ if (qsb->size < new_size) { >> >+ struct iovec *new_iov; >> >+ size_t size_diff = new_size - qsb->size; >> >+ size_t chunk_size = (size_diff > QSB_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE) >> >+ ? QSB_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE : QSB_CHUNK_SIZE; >> >+ >> >+ needed_chunks = DIV_ROUND_UP(size_diff, chunk_size); >> >+ >> >+ new_iov = g_try_malloc_n(qsb->n_iov + needed_chunks, >> >+ sizeof(struct iovec)); >> >> It seems that *g_try_malloc_n* was supported since glib2-2.24 version, >> But it don't check this when do *configure* before compile...;) > > OK, that's a shame - it was a nice easy function to use :-) > I'll fix it. See also commit 02c4f26.