From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:37002 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752010AbaBRVcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:32:13 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <1392403428-4593-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com> <20140214220525.GB3506@fieldses.org> <8761ohnoew.fsf@xmission.com> <20140215024524.GA6660@fieldses.org> <20140218202652.GA12374@fieldses.org> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:32:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20140218202652.GA12374@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:26:52 -0500") Message-ID: <8738jgrtt7.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when mounting default subvol Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:45:24PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:40:55PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > "J. Bruce Fields" writes: >> > >> > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:43:48PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >> > >> A user was running into errors from an NFS export of a subvolume that had a >> > >> default subvol set. When we mount a default subvol we will use d_obtain_alias() >> > >> to find an existing dentry for the subvolume in the case that the root subvol >> > >> has already been mounted, or a dummy one is allocated in the case that the root >> > >> subvol has not already been mounted. This allows us to connect the dentry later >> > >> on if we wander into the path. However if we don't ever wander into the path we >> > >> will keep DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set for a long time, which angers NFS. It doesn't >> > >> appear to cause any problems but it is annoying nonetheless, so simply unset >> > >> DCACHE_DISCONNECTED in the get_default_root case and switch btrfs_lookup() to >> > >> use d_materialise_unique() instead which will make everything play nicely >> > >> together and reconnect stuff if we wander into the defaul subvol path from a >> > >> different way. With this patch I'm no longer getting the NFS errors when >> > >> exporting a volume that has been mounted with a default subvol set. Thanks, >> > > >> > > Looks obviously correct, but based on a quick grep, there are four >> > > d_obtain_alias callers outside export methods: >> > > >> > > - btrfs/super.c:get_default_root() >> > > - fs/ceph/super.c:open_root_dentry() >> > > - fs/nfs/getroot.c:nfs_get_root() >> > > - fs/nilfs2/super.c:nilfs_get_root_dentry() >> > > >> > > It'd be nice to give them a common d_obtain_alias variant instead of >> > > making them all clear this by hand. >> > >> > I am in favor of one small fix at a time, so that progress is made and >> > fixing something just for btrfs seems reasonable for the short term. >> > >> > > Of those nilfs2 also uses d_splice_alias. I think that problem would >> > > best be solved by fixing d_splice_alias not to require a >> > > DCACHE_DISCONNECTED dentry; IS_ROOT() on its own should be fine. >> > >> > You mean by renaming d_splice_alias d_materialise_unique? >> > >> > Or is there a useful distinction you see that should be preserved >> > between the two methods? >> > >> > Right now my inclination is that everyone should just use >> > d_materialise_unique and we should kill d_splice_alias. >> >> Probably. One remaining distinction: >> >> - In the local filesystem case if you discover a directory is >> already aliased elsewhere, you have a corrupted filesystem and >> want to error out the lookup. (Didn't you propose a patch to >> do something like that before?) >> - In the distributed filesystem this is perfectly normal and we >> want to do our best to fix up our local cache to represent >> remote reality. > > The following keeps the d_splice_alias/d_materialise_unique distinction > and (hopefully) fixes Josef's bug, and does a little cleanup (including > your suggested DISCONNECTED->CONNECTING rename). > > Any better idea for the naming of d_materialise_unique? > > I also didn't try to merge the implementations--the merged > d_splice_alias/d_materialise_unique was a little uglier than I expected. > I'll keep messing around with it though. Your patchset sounds good I am going to aim for reading them through and reviewing them soonish. Eric