From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQfj7-0000yq-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQfj2-0004fJ-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQfj1-0004f2-Vq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:32 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1380452123-5989-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1380452123-5989-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20130930151056.32699e7f@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20130930144050.GB22806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:49:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:10:52 +0900") Message-ID: <8738om1f95.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/26] qemu: add Error to typedefs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann , Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Peter Maydell writes: > On 30 September 2013 23:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> diff --git a/include/qapi/error.h b/include/qapi/error.h >> index 7d4c696..b85e996 100644 >> --- a/include/qapi/error.h >> +++ b/include/qapi/error.h >> @@ -13,14 +13,15 @@ >> #define ERROR_H >> >> #include "qemu/compiler.h" >> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h" >> #include "qapi-types.h" >> #include >> >> /** >> - * A class representing internal errors within QEMU. An error has a ErrorClass >> + * Error: >> + * An object representing internal errors within QEMU. An error has a ErrorClass >> * code and a human message. >> */ >> -typedef struct Error Error; > > Does the process-doc-comments tool really cope with documentation comments > that are completely separate from the typedef like this? Even if they do, I don't.