From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1UIk7i-0002P3-1h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:22:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1UIk7h-0007m6-3J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:21:57 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32073)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1UIk7g-0007lq-Oe
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:21:57 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130321174635.GA4112@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message
	of "Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:46:35 +0200")
References: <1363881940-27505-1-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com>
	<1363881940-27505-10-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com>
	<20130321161608.GE1925@redhat.com> <514B34FE.6010901@redhat.com>
	<20130321162912.GH1925@redhat.com> <877gl0ps0h.fsf@elfo.elfo>
	<20130321174635.GA4112@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:22:01 +0100
Message-ID: <8738vopq9i.fsf@elfo.elfo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 9/9] coalesce adjacent iovecs
Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, chegu_vinod@hp.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

>> <header>
>> <page>
>> <header>
>> <page>
>> <header>
>> <page>
>> 
>> We can optimize at some pount to write a bigger/different header and
>> sent a bunch of pages together, but just now we don't have that code.
>> 
>> Later, Juan.
>
> Sending the page can do vmsplice, can't it?
> Multipage is likely a good idea anyway, e.g. RDMA wants to
> do this too.

RDMA requires de pages lock into memory, no?

Later, Juan.