From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:46:29 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Does the kexec package buildroot-2009.05 for i386? In-Reply-To: <87a5b0800908280931x523f6c88k1e006634d612425f@mail.gmail.com> (Will Newton's message of "Fri\, 28 Aug 2009 17\:31\:17 +0100") References: <2d6a9f6f0908271429j91a36e9s2342c23762a8552@mail.gmail.com> <87fxbcro1c.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <2d6a9f6f0908280920q41f09dak9120c88370e14aa1@mail.gmail.com> <87a5b0800908280931x523f6c88k1e006634d612425f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <873a79svka.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Will" == Will Newton writes: Hi, Will> buildroot does not seem to be happy with /bin/sh pointing at Will> dash, it would seem to require bash (I don't have any specific Will> failures in mind, but I have seen a few). I find it easiest just Will> to make sure that /bin/sh points at bash if I'm using Ubuntu. Really? Buildroot itself shouldn't care as we explicitly use bash, but the build system of various packages could ofcourse fail. Please report if you notice something like this in the future so we can get it fixed. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard