From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: is gitosis secure? Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:48:51 +0100 Message-ID: <873afgsul8.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <200812090956.48613.thomas@koch.ro> <1228813453.28186.73.camel@maia.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 18 13:23:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LOWgu-0004C9-H7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:23:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756501AbZARMW0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:22:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754688AbZARMWY (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:22:24 -0500 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:38693 "EHLO mail.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753913AbZARMWY (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:22:24 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2010 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:22:24 EST Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1LOW95-0001cP-LE for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:48:51 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LOW95-0002Gs-3k for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:48:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1228813453.28186.73.camel@maia.lan> (Sam Vilain's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:04:13 +1300") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Sam Vilain: > Restricted unix shells are a technology which has been proven secure for > decades now. Huh? Things like scponly and rssh had their share of bugs, so I can see that there is some concern. (And restricted shells used to be circumvented by things like Netscape's print dialog.)