From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwEG-0007rE-47 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:07:40 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwED-0007pv-M5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:07:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwEC-0007om-5a for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:07:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52269 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOwEB-0007oi-Sy for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:07:35 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]:3250) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOwEB-00072v-C4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:07:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m71F7Vh5094880 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:07:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20080801144818.GA17609@thorin> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:09:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20080801144818.GA17609@thorin> (Robert Millan's message of "Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:48:18 +0200") Message-ID: <873aloixfu.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: rename grub to grub-legacy ? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:07:38 -0000 Hi, Robert Millan writes: > What would you think of renaming grub to grub-legacy in SVN ? > > I think it'd help send a strong message that we consider this a legacy branch > and is not open for further development. This is fine for me. Can you do this assuming Okuji and other developers do not have strong objections? -- Marco