From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1IquIb-0007wY-Mv for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:39:13 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IquIZ-0007vJ-9O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:39:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IquIX-0007tP-21 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:39:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IquIW-0007sh-6P for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:39:08 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.34]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IquIV-0002jH-Gi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:39:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAAHd6nW093883 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:39:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <46A7BDBF.3040903@nic.fi> <9f50a7a00707251528x3c9c927dk8bb4fb3e956c9203@mail.gmail.com> <200708072119.08147.okuji@enbug.org> <9f50a7a00708071248j3b433df2q84ccef96712b411e@mail.gmail.com> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:39:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9f50a7a00708071248j3b433df2q84ccef96712b411e@mail.gmail.com> (Jerone Young's message of "Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:48:14 -0500") Message-ID: <873avedmoz.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: grub2 ChangeLog conf/i386-pc.rmk conf/powerpc-i... X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:39:11 -0000 "Jerone Young" writes: > That sounds reasonable. So perhaps having a multiboot directory as > Marco specified is the best way to go then. Let me know if this is an > a way everyone agrees on and I'll get a patch together to make things > nice for everyone. I hear no objections... :-) Too bad CVS sucks for these kinds of things :-) -- Marco