From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: setexeccon vs. setfscreatecon
In-Reply-To: <1155055561.1123.75.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> (Stephen
	Smalley's message of "Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:46:01 -0400")
References: <87u04ncqqq.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
	<1155050462.1123.36.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
	<87ejvrcj9i.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
	<1155055561.1123.75.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:27:56 +0200
Message-ID: <873bc7cf37.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov

Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
...
> No, it just means I didn't explain adequately ;)
>
> When a task sets its exec context to a particular value, then that
...

Ahh... I see, now.
Thanks for taking the time.

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.