From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA22553 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:48:51 -0600 Received: from ottawa.linuxcare.com (HELO localhost) (216.208.98.2) by mailserv2.iuinc.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2000 14:50:04 -0000 To: law@cygnus.com Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] untested but building 64-bit toolchain, issues/questions References: <7553.962836782@upchuck> <87puorl517.fsf@linuxcare.com> From: David Huggins-Daines Date: 06 Jul 2000 10:49:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: David Huggins-Daines's message of "06 Jul 2000 10:14:28 -0400" Message-ID: <873dlnl3f9.fsf@linuxcare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: David Huggins-Daines writes: > Jeffrey A Law writes: > > > 64bit is hppa64-*-*. > > > > We do _not_ want to ever default the tools to 64bit due to the significant > > code generation penalties that involves. > > > > Thus we can not key 64bit generation on the strings returned by config.guess. > > Yes, but I thought that 'hppa2.0w' means 64 bit by definition, so it > strikes me that the problem is with config.guess returning this. Oh, and one more thing. GCC thinks that hppa2.0w is a 64-bit target. -- dhd@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.