All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fat: batch synchronous mirror writes
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 12:34:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ie7ddeq.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026163941.495833-2-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>

Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br> writes:

> fat_mirror_bhs() currently synchronizes buffer-by-buffer on synchronous
> mounts, serializing I/O and degrading performance.
>
> Make fat_mirror_bhs() batch dirty buffer heads and use fat_sync_bhs()
> to sync several at once. Add a fat_brelse_array() helper that releases
> buffer heads in an array.
>
> Benchmarking was done under QEMU/KVM with a virtio-blk device using
> cache=directsync. Each result is the arithmetic mean of 10 samples.
>
> start = now_ns();
> for (unsigned i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> 	fallocate(fds[i], FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, bytes);
> }
> elapsed = now_ns() - start;
>
> Sync-mounted FAT32 using count=16 files:
> File size    Cluster size    Before    After    Improvement
> 256MiB       512B            49.81s    12.26s   4.06x
> 1MiB         512B            0.198s    0.057s   3.50x
> 256MiB       4096B           7.060s    1.640s   4.31x
> 1MiB         4096B           0.073s    0.028s   2.60x
>
> Asynchronous mounts were also benchmarked with no noticeable performance
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>

Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

> ---
>  fs/fat/fat.h    |  1 +
>  fs/fat/fatent.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  fs/fat/misc.c   |  6 ++++
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.h b/fs/fat/fat.h
> index 1d051d0628b6..204c7b87108f 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fat.h
> +++ b/fs/fat/fat.h
> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ void fat_truncate_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *now,
>  int fat_update_time(struct inode *inode, enum fs_update_time type,
>  		unsigned int flags);
>  extern int fat_sync_bhs(struct buffer_head **bhs, int nr_bhs);
> +void fat_brelse_array(struct buffer_head *bhs[], int n);
>  
>  int fat_cache_init(void);
>  void fat_cache_destroy(void);
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c
> index 8897a5dd522d..d42b5324531a 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c
> @@ -376,42 +376,76 @@ int fat_ent_read(struct inode *inode, struct fat_entry *fatent, int entry)
>  	return ops->ent_get(fatent);
>  }
>  
> -/* FIXME: We can write the blocks as more big chunk. */
> -static int fat_mirror_bhs(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> -			  int nr_bhs)
> +static int fat_mirror_one(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> +			  int nr_bhs, int target)
>  {
>  	struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb);
> +	sector_t backup_fat = sbi->fat_length * target;
> +	/*
> +	 * Use the value of MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE for 4K pages. This reduces stack
> +	 * usage on large-page architectures as callers may already have a
> +	 * MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE-sized array in their stack.
> +	 */
> +	struct buffer_head *dirty[8];
>  	struct buffer_head *c_bh;
> -	int err, n, copy;
> +	int err, n, nr_dirty;
>  
> +	nr_dirty = 0;
>  	err = 0;
> -	for (copy = 1; copy < sbi->fats; copy++) {
> -		sector_t backup_fat = sbi->fat_length * copy;
> -
> -		for (n = 0; n < nr_bhs; n++) {
> -			c_bh = sb_getblk(sb, backup_fat + bhs[n]->b_blocknr);
> -			if (!c_bh) {
> -				err = -ENOMEM;
> -				goto error;
> +	for (n = 0; n < nr_bhs; n++) {
> +		c_bh = sb_getblk(sb, backup_fat + bhs[n]->b_blocknr);
> +		if (!c_bh) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto error;
> +		}
> +		/* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
> +		lock_buffer(c_bh);
> +		memcpy(c_bh->b_data, bhs[n]->b_data, sb->s_blocksize);
> +		set_buffer_uptodate(c_bh);
> +		unlock_buffer(c_bh);
> +		mmb_mark_buffer_dirty(c_bh,
> +			&MSDOS_I(sbi->fat_inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
> +		if (sb->s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS) {
> +			dirty[nr_dirty] = c_bh;
> +			++nr_dirty;
> +			if (nr_dirty == ARRAY_SIZE(dirty)) {
> +				err = fat_sync_bhs(dirty, nr_dirty);
> +				fat_brelse_array(dirty, nr_dirty);
> +				nr_dirty = 0;
> +				if (err)
> +					goto error;
>  			}
> -			/* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
> -			lock_buffer(c_bh);
> -			memcpy(c_bh->b_data, bhs[n]->b_data, sb->s_blocksize);
> -			set_buffer_uptodate(c_bh);
> -			unlock_buffer(c_bh);
> -			mmb_mark_buffer_dirty(c_bh,
> -				&MSDOS_I(sbi->fat_inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
> -			if (sb->s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
> -				err = sync_dirty_buffer(c_bh);
> +		} else {
>  			brelse(c_bh);
> -			if (err)
> -				goto error;
>  		}
>  	}
> +
>  error:
> +	if (nr_dirty) {
> +		int err2 = fat_sync_bhs(dirty, nr_dirty);
> +		if (!err)
> +			err = err2;
> +		fat_brelse_array(dirty, nr_dirty);
> +	}
> +
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int fat_mirror_bhs(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> +			  int nr_bhs)
> +{
> +	struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb);
> +	int copy;
> +
> +	for (copy = 1; copy < sbi->fats; copy++) {
> +		int err = fat_mirror_one(sb, bhs, nr_bhs, copy);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int fat_ent_write(struct inode *inode, struct fat_entry *fatent,
>  		  int new, int wait)
>  {
> diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c
> index 0d04228f916e..b6a9e2e122cd 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/misc.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/misc.c
> @@ -365,3 +365,9 @@ int fat_sync_bhs(struct buffer_head **bhs, int nr_bhs)
>  	}
>  	return err;
>  }
> +
> +void fat_brelse_array(struct buffer_head *bhs[], int n)
> +{
> +	while (--n >= 0)
> +		brelse(bhs[n]);
> +}

-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-26 16:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] fat: improve synchronous mount performance Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-26 16:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fat: batch synchronous mirror writes Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-27  3:34   ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
2026-10-26 16:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fat: improve fat_sync_bhs() write submission Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-27  3:35   ` OGAWA Hirofumi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ie7ddeq.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.