All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
	Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
	tabba@google.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	ljs@kernel.org, itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map (new data structure)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:54:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ig55u5h.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46342b48-550e-42c1-9d9f-e800c72269c2@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:01:24 +0100,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/3/26 9:28 PM, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 08:43:35AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:35:00 +0100,
> >> Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Wei-Lin,
> >>> 
> >>> I tested this series on a Yitian 710 system with an ARM Neoverse-N2 CPU
> >>> (128 CPUs, 2 NUMA nodes).
> >>> 
> >>> Test environment
> >>> ----------------
> >>> 
> >>>    L0 kernel: Linux v7.2-rc6
> >>>    L1 guest: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, kernel 7.0.0-27-generic (aarch64)
> >>>    QEMU: 10.2.3
> >>> 
> >>> L0 NUMA balancing was enabled (`/proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing=1`).
> >>> The host was booted with `kvm_arm.mode=nested`.
> >>> 
> >>> This series fixes a functional hang that is exposed when NUMA balancing is
> >>> enabled.  The previous nested stage-2 unmap path is too slow for this
> >>> workload, making the performance problem user-visible: NUMA balancing can
> >>> leave the L1 guest unable to make progress and eventually hang during boot.
> >>> 
> >>> The L1 was started with 8 vCPUs and 32 GiB of RAM using:
> >>> 
> >>>    qemu-system-aarch64 -smp 8 -m 32G \
> >>>      -machine virt,accel=kvm,gic-version=3,virtualization=on \
> >>>      -cpu host -nographic -enable-kvm \
> >>>      -drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=on,file=pflash0_bak.img \
> >>>      -drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=pflash1_bak.img \
> >>>      -drive file=./ubuntu-vm.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio,cache=none,aio=native \
> >>>      -nic user,model=virtio-net-pci,hostfwd=tcp::11234-:22 \
> >>>      -serial mon:stdio
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Puzzling. If you are only running an L1 in VHE mode, there is no
> >> shadow S2, and therefore nothing to unmap. For shadow S2s to be built
> >> and affect the MMU notifiers, you need to run an L2.
> > 
> > I was thinking the same at first, but realized even with L1 in VHE mode
> > there is a small period of time where L1 runs in its EL1 during boot, so
> > one nested MMU will become valid for each vCPU. That causes
> > kvm_nested_s2_unmap() to iterate through the entire IPA space 8 times
> > (-smp 8).
> > 
> > What I am curious about is whether one single notifier unmap is enough
> > to hang L1, or were there multiple notifier unmaps.
> > 
> > QEMU with -machine virt uses 40 IPA bits only, unmapping that takes:
> > 1024  (4KB pages,  unmapping 1GB per iteration)
> > 32768 (16KB pages, unmapping 32MB per iteration)
> > 2048  (64KB pages, unmapping 512MB per iteration)
> > iterations for each page size. There aren't many mappings in each
> > iteration too. Does this really take that long on real hardware (even if
> > this must be done 8 times)?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Wei-Lin Chang
> > 
> >> 
> >> So what are your actual test conditions?
> >> 
> >> 	M.
> >> 
> 
> Hi, Wei-Lin and Marc,
> 
> I was able to reproduce this issue and capture ftrace evidence that confirms
> the root cause. Below is the analysis, trace log, and timing data.

[...]

> Each set_migration_pte line is a single-page NUMA migration. Yet each
> migration triggers one full kvm_nested_s2_unmap() that takes 877 ms.

And why is it taking so long? It should be *empty* after the first
iteration.

[...]

> ## Conclusion
> 
> The root cause is confirmed: kvm_nested_s2_unmap() performs a full IPA space
> unmap in the MMU notifier path instead of unmapping only the affected
> GPA/CPAI range. The interval-tree-based precise range unmap approach is the
> right fix.

No. This just indicates that this is papering over a bigger problem,
and your AI is jumping to conclusions.

> Please consider applying the patch that replaces the full unmap with
> kvm_nested_unmap_cipa_range() to avoid scanning the entire nested stage-2
> page table on every NUMA migration.

Not until we get to the bottom of this issue.

	M.

-- 
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 20:50 [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map (new data structure) Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-14  1:04   ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-08-14 10:42     ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-16 22:01       ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-06 15:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-06 19:56     ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-11 15:27       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-10 20:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-12  2:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map (new data structure) Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-02 16:35 ` Wang Han
2026-09-03  7:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-03 13:28     ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-04  7:01       ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-04  7:54         ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-09-05 15:35           ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-06 10:42             ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-06 13:02               ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-08 15:44               ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-11  5:47               ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-04  7:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-04 11:37         ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-04 22:42         ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-05 13:48           ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-05 15:49           ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-05 23:48             ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-06  2:16               ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-11 13:16 ` Wei-Lin Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ig55u5h.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=wanghan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.