From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3326B1E521B; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749507783; cv=none; b=Q0elkajTGwgLvhwC/bcklCcZkaY5yC0zF5NjO4PJ3dRD/eeI6NmfbfPbO+rRvQueF7X4GQf9CfnmbUMWjxAngLs7bLxeeKFaL4dTRR4cDd3Bl1MEibij9Xbm7c3bv6Gkj+ljwxBpT7YW5icTWr71twj0juEa3rER3UFAWhEqJPY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749507783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VaUIKhr9K7NDCCL3tVxwzKuCpQ3/ESayhC9+FlDM510=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a88mbg5CBuE4C4wWcu78h6mJVNgVhw+14n7oaNoG+3vRpWa1lklo29vij8nAFjpTRUlcSBbIKPVZma8Z+LP6vAJxzLa2HDbnlShb+DKf8stoeY4RHcHTJt7g6kfYhJCnPCjeTYVWYthJa0uJxAdz2YPe2087RZuaWx/fGcKyYY0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=DG5a2Ye5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="DG5a2Ye5" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5285D41AA1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1749507781; bh=E91NmzyhKhHUs7IzCQWOajEB1EYNtF10BTHf2NYCdio=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DG5a2Ye5Tuka2amQYJQXXpIMiCRCP8cfDVin/RFEvPyhzZXBUxGhQtbhDvLMyEcnC DunB3FgYmDxyr6OuJ3nxuFJdu1blLBdt9M5nebk+cP5uo0h7CPK0P1BdWl7uZRzUW9 lqwyV6y9YEu6njiFdg9TAgirfi46j76f8E79YQ7i8vDRYBtCWJPO5vq1z7jq0Ulout fpo9vMbkknplEdWMSLyqh13aROCOVX9v2OKXp/oQBJ/u3cG3zQR2qyJ9H7RRV6RA+s x4MXQqzYqVJsiqAPXHCgR3BZaxbhoKUpRrfTAPcxnBXh3ATw8d2wQv94zPFiw184uB n1dZTju3EmOtA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5285D41AA1; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:23:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Shouye Liu , shouyeliu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree In-Reply-To: <20250610081759.185e7982@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250610081759.185e7982@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:23:00 -0600 Message-ID: <874iwo8shn.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 47cbe79dedbe ("Documentation: amd-pstate:fix minimum performance state label error") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. > > Actually it looks like 2 different email addresses have been used. Gee, I must have pushed that tree at least five minutes ago, you couldn't find this sooner? :) Shouye, can you send me a version with a matching signoff, please? Thanks, jon