All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ibmveth: make veth_pool_store stop hanging
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 08:29:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874iz8au2c.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d90b5e4-bd6d-4d78-a1c5-044621c06c96@redhat.com> (Paolo Abeni's message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:52:51 +0200")

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> writes:

> On 3/31/25 11:23 PM, davemarq@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>> From: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
>> 
>> Use rtnl_mutex to synchronize veth_pool_store with itself,
>> ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open, preventing multiple calls in a row to
>> napi_disable.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
>> Fixes: 860f242eb534 ("[PATCH] ibmveth change buffer pools dynamically")
>> Reviewed-by: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> In working on removing BUG_ON calls from ibmveth, I realized that 2
>> threads could call veth_pool_store through writing to
>> /sys/devices/vio/30000002/pool*/*. You can do this easily with a little
>> shell script.
>> 
>> Running on a 6.14 kernel, I saw a hang:
>> 
>>     [  243.683282][  T108] INFO: task stress.sh:5829 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>     [  243.683300][  T108]       Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82 #3
>>     [  243.683303][  T108] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>     [  366.563278][  T108] INFO: task stress.sh:5829 blocked for more than 245 seconds.
>>     [  366.563297][  T108]       Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82 #3
>>     [  366.563301][  T108] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> 
>> I configured LOCKDEP, compiled ibmveth.c with DEBUG, and built a new
>> kernel. I ran the test again and saw:
>> 
>>     Setting pool0/active to 0
>>     Setting pool1/active to 1
>>     [   73.911067][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
>>     Setting pool1/active to 1
>>     Setting pool1/active to 0
>>     [   73.911367][ T4366] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
>>     [   73.916056][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close complete
>>     [   73.916064][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: open starting
>>     [  110.808564][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
>>     [  230.808495][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
>>     [  243.683786][  T123] INFO: task stress.sh:4365 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>>     [  243.683827][  T123]       Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82-dirty #8
>>     [  243.683833][  T123] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>     [  243.683838][  T123] task:stress.sh       state:D stack:28096 pid:4365  tgid:4365  ppid:4364   task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00042000
>>     [  243.683852][  T123] Call Trace:
>>     [  243.683857][  T123] [c00000000c38f690] [0000000000000001] 0x1 (unreliable)
>>     [  243.683868][  T123] [c00000000c38f840] [c00000000001f908] __switch_to+0x318/0x4e0
>>     [  243.683878][  T123] [c00000000c38f8a0] [c000000001549a70] __schedule+0x500/0x12a0
>>     [  243.683888][  T123] [c00000000c38f9a0] [c00000000154a878] schedule+0x68/0x210
>>     [  243.683896][  T123] [c00000000c38f9d0] [c00000000154ac80] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x30/0x50
>>     [  243.683904][  T123] [c00000000c38fa00] [c00000000154dbb0] __mutex_lock+0x730/0x10f0
>>     [  243.683913][  T123] [c00000000c38fb10] [c000000001154d40] napi_enable+0x30/0x60
>>     [  243.683921][  T123] [c00000000c38fb40] [c000000000f4ae94] ibmveth_open+0x68/0x5dc
>>     [  243.683928][  T123] [c00000000c38fbe0] [c000000000f4aa20] veth_pool_store+0x220/0x270
>>     [  243.683936][  T123] [c00000000c38fc70] [c000000000826278] sysfs_kf_write+0x68/0xb0
>>     [  243.683944][  T123] [c00000000c38fcb0] [c0000000008240b8] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x198/0x2d0
>>     [  243.683951][  T123] [c00000000c38fd00] [c00000000071b9ac] vfs_write+0x34c/0x650
>>     [  243.683958][  T123] [c00000000c38fdc0] [c00000000071bea8] ksys_write+0x88/0x150
>>     [  243.683966][  T123] [c00000000c38fe10] [c0000000000317f4] system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
>>     [  243.683973][  T123] [c00000000c38fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
>>     ...
>>     [  243.684087][  T123] Showing all locks held in the system:
>>     [  243.684095][  T123] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/123:
>>     [  243.684099][  T123]  #0: c00000000278e370 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x50/0x248
>>     [  243.684114][  T123] 4 locks held by stress.sh/4365:
>>     [  243.684119][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
>>     [  243.684132][  T123]  #1: c000000041aea888 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
>>     [  243.684143][  T123]  #2: c0000000366fb9a8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
>>     [  243.684155][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_enable+0x30/0x60
>>     [  243.684166][  T123] 5 locks held by stress.sh/4366:
>>     [  243.684170][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
>>     [  243.684183][  T123]  #1: c00000000aee2288 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
>>     [  243.684194][  T123]  #2: c0000000366f4ba8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
>>     [  243.684205][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_disable+0x30/0x60
>>     [  243.684216][  T123]  #4: c0000003ff9bbf18 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0x138/0x12a0
>> 
>> From the ibmveth debug, two threads are calling veth_pool_store, which
>> calls ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open. Here's the sequence:
>> 
>>   T4365             T4366             
>>   ----------------- ----------------- ---------
>>   veth_pool_store   veth_pool_store   
>>                     ibmveth_close     
>>   ibmveth_close                       
>>   napi_disable                        
>>                     napi_disable      
>>   ibmveth_open                        
>>   napi_enable                         <- HANG
>> 
>> ibmveth_close calls napi_disable at the top and ibmveth_open calls
>> napi_enable at the top.
>> 
>> https://docs.kernel.org/networking/napi.html]] says
>> 
>>   The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe
>>   against concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of
>>   control API calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race
>>   conditions. For example, calling napi_disable() multiple times in a
>>   row will deadlock.
>> 
>> In the normal open and close paths, rtnl_mutex is acquired to prevent
>> other callers. This is missing from veth_pool_store. Use rtnl_mutex in
>> veth_pool_store fixes these hangs.
>
> Some/most of the above should actually land into the commit message,
> please rewrite it accordingly.

Okay, will do for v2.

>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
>> index b619a3ec245b..77ef19a53e72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
>> @@ -1802,18 +1802,24 @@ static ssize_t veth_pool_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>>  	long value = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
>>  	long rc;
>>  
>> +	rtnl_lock();
>> +
>>  	if (attr == &veth_active_attr) {
>>  		if (value && !pool->active) {
>>  			if (netif_running(netdev)) {
>>  				if (ibmveth_alloc_buffer_pool(pool)) {
>>  					netdev_err(netdev,
>>  						   "unable to alloc pool\n");
>> +					rtnl_unlock();
>>  					return -ENOMEM;
>>  				}
>>  				pool->active = 1;
>>  				ibmveth_close(netdev);
>> -				if ((rc = ibmveth_open(netdev)))
>> +				rc = ibmveth_open(netdev);
>> +				if (rc) {
>> +					rtnl_unlock();
>>  					return rc;
>
> If you avoid a bit of duplicate code with
> 					goto unlock_err;
>
> // at the end of the function
> unlock_err:
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 	return rc;

Yes, I'll do this for v2. Thanks.

-Dave

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-31 21:23 [PATCH net] net: ibmveth: make veth_pool_store stop hanging davemarq
2025-04-01 10:01 ` Simon Horman
2025-04-01 11:52 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-01 13:29   ` Dave Marquardt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874iz8au2c.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.