All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Remove the deprecated 2.4 and 2.5 machine types
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:59:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874j2abx04.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103144232.520383-2-thuth@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 03 2025, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:

> They are older than 6 years, so according to our machine support
> policy, they can be removed now.
>
> This removes the requirements for the storage keys "migration-enabled"
> property which will be removed in the next patch. It also removes
> the code that sets "max_revision" to 0 for some CCW devices, but
> the relating code in virtio-ccw.c indicates that 0 could have also
> been in use for other machines types < 5.1, so further clean-up for
> code related to "max_revision" won't be done yet.

These are two different issues:
- QEMU 2.4 and earlier _defaulted_ to legacy virtio devices (enforced by
  setting max_revision to 0)
- QEMU 5.0 and earlier _allowed_ virtio device types to be configured as
  legacy devices that did not actually support legacy (e.g. virtio-gpu),
  there's a compat value to allow a max_revision of 0 for those old
  machine types

So that's not a problem -- but I wonder whether we had missed the boat
elsewhere, when we introduced revisions > 1 (nothing much we can do now
if that is the case, though.)

I also don't think we actually want to remove max_revision anyway, as it
could also be used for non-compat related things (e.g. to accommodate a
known buggy driver.)

>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 37 -------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)

The patch itself LGTM.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-03 14:42 [PATCH 00/10] hw/s390x: Remove deprecated machine types 2.4 up to 2.8 Thomas Huth
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Remove the deprecated 2.4 and 2.5 machine types Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 11:03   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-07 11:06     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-07 12:59   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] hw/s390x/s390-skeys: Remove the "migration-enabled" property Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:00   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Remove the deprecated 2.6 machine type Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] hw/s390x: Remove the "ri_allowed" switch Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] hw/s390x/ipl: Remove the "iplbext_migration" property Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 11:04   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-07 13:04   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] hw/s390x/css-bridge: Remove the "css_dev_path" property Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 11:05   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-07 13:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Remove the deprecated 2.7 machine type Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] hw/s390x: Remove the cpu_model_allowed flag and related code Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Remove the deprecated 2.8 machine type Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 13:10   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-03 14:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] hw/s390x: Remove the "adapter_routes_max_batch" property from the flic Thomas Huth
2025-01-07 11:06   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-01-07 13:11   ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-07 10:22 ` [PATCH 00/10] hw/s390x: Remove deprecated machine types 2.4 up to 2.8 Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874j2abx04.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.