From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087E520627F; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733503661; cv=none; b=XCyOu0YQxkPmpFcdiq5jJXehxiwNk171tg9cQ0B29Z4zB9lbRzyXzqSKAGQtbfW6/6MMKP4vc8V4XeJF4ud2FuWqhEc53jtUOZX5SmHOYNsMa7w1Yl3teX7TWUw5SIvwv4mgkUVhi912R/RMY7rq7muQncXTc6NLZjWzlz1T408= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733503661; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kvE0y4dFgneEl0Xw4h78GAQyKPGVaNI2DxPT0S+gJgQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pZNplnS/OSTH042BRxqEH6CPv4Ajt2L60bTicy9tbgRONKFUt4ZP+Y+Y8XFloPAa3GYHc9OvmSDrOR+cmrisMD5vVRq5EjNpB2/dOItf8CfiC7mN88ibWxmElWgvS9SlZ0Z7JDJyNzESX6ecwe59V0oKngc8gWhySoKIZ6zdUcg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=XQcXF0K0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="XQcXF0K0" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 1AFEF40409 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1733503659; bh=PSEFYRD5HPP4WZPiIKjB1GYPa+JV0S6EbNMDEY+qpB8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XQcXF0K0yueFjTcsx6fWvYkD/PYs3+k9Q6p1Igjct9xFlHmofbGtlfSR8JmAW1M2x SMB9L2pyMp2Wt7rnHGVng3X8goQKyVLXxaOB73EZSTXO0ILSWtQ5/hD8CYPcXY5kzU VkySquII2r41kGxp1Z6e2pHmGjO7tfR2HaAdqk8HCKLhPtj7h+iXdSI+UvM6iO3q2e 1+UUzxSRjai4ge2oVdRWS9wF0z+EnUdJu+id3rfuiWhTH1agpeQVzNVqaD0EF0jTBa 59Gx6uRMVhpHBgwjxo7Cg4k56eTZm2QG4t89A+BjvLQn00/geEf6EyAwVeJKLr0LWy pPxsmxjYiV6OQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AFEF40409; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes In-Reply-To: <20241128152546.2396782-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20241128152546.2396782-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 09:47:38 -0700 Message-ID: <874j3gu5at.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Andy Shevchenko writes: > The boot.rst is combined from the pieces of different epochs, hence has > some inconsistencies in style and format. Fix (some of) them in this > mini-series. Rendered result has been manually checked for PDF and HTML. > > Andy Shevchenko (3): > x86/Documentation: Make Literal Blocks to follow reStructuredText > specification > x86/Documentation: Align Note Blocks style > x86/Documentation: Elaborate Intel MID device list > > Documentation/arch/x86/boot.rst | 369 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) How were you thinking of getting this one upstream? I can take it through docs if that's what's wanted, but would like an x86 ack first. Thanks, jon