From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Enable threaded NAPI on WCN6750
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:49:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jxicqcr.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcc14883-51c9-c1bb-bbea-1b309eccedf2@quicinc.com> (Manikanta Pubbisetty's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:47:41 +0530")
Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com> writes:
>> Also more testing would be nice. Enabling something like this with
>> testing only on one hardware family (WCN7850) can be risky. I always get
>> warm fuzzy feelings if a patch is tested with all three hardware
>> families we currently support:
>>
>> * IPQ8074 etc
>> * QCA6390 etc
>> * WCN7850
>
> WCN7850 should be an ath12k device If I'm correct.
Sorry, I meant WCN6855. Too many drivers and too many hardware...
> Regardless of the chip family, even I feel that the tput changes like
> these should be tested on all the chipsets. Availability of the
> hardware and time are something which are stopping me in testing the
> changes on all supported targets.
I have the same problem, I cannot test all possible hardware. That's why
I was requsting help here.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
Cc: <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Enable threaded NAPI on WCN6750
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:49:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jxicqcr.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcc14883-51c9-c1bb-bbea-1b309eccedf2@quicinc.com> (Manikanta Pubbisetty's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:47:41 +0530")
Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com> writes:
>> Also more testing would be nice. Enabling something like this with
>> testing only on one hardware family (WCN7850) can be risky. I always get
>> warm fuzzy feelings if a patch is tested with all three hardware
>> families we currently support:
>>
>> * IPQ8074 etc
>> * QCA6390 etc
>> * WCN7850
>
> WCN7850 should be an ath12k device If I'm correct.
Sorry, I meant WCN6855. Too many drivers and too many hardware...
> Regardless of the chip family, even I feel that the tput changes like
> these should be tested on all the chipsets. Availability of the
> hardware and time are something which are stopping me in testing the
> changes on all supported targets.
I have the same problem, I cannot test all possible hardware. That's why
I was requsting help here.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-20 13:51 [PATCH 0/3] Throughput fixes for WCN6750 Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Enable threaded NAPI on WCN6750 Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 12:37 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 12:37 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 12:54 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 12:54 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 12:48 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 12:48 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 13:17 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 13:17 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 13:20 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-02 13:20 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-02 13:42 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 13:42 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 13:46 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-02 13:46 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-02 14:30 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 14:30 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-08 6:46 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-08 6:46 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-08 8:49 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-08 8:49 ` Robert Marko
2022-09-08 12:15 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-08 12:15 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-08 6:49 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2022-09-08 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
2022-07-20 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath11k: Add multi TX ring support for WCN6750 Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 12:49 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 12:49 ` Kalle Valo
2022-09-02 13:44 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-09-02 13:44 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath11k: Increase TCL data ring size " Manikanta Pubbisetty
2022-07-20 13:51 ` Manikanta Pubbisetty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jxicqcr.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.