From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
jvgediya.oss@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/8] mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:08:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jzch2sl.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220720025920.1373558-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
I missed folding a list walking fix. Use this diff on top
for testing.
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index b2da34a1f06c..f3d720b7dc6c 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -300,12 +300,12 @@ static void establish_migration_targets(void)
nd = &node_demotion[node];
memtier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
- if (!memtier || list_is_last(&memtier->list, &memory_tiers))
+ if (!memtier || list_is_first(&memtier->list, &memory_tiers))
continue;
/*
* Get the next memtier to find the demotion node list.
*/
- memtier = list_next_entry(memtier, list);
+ memtier = list_prev_entry(memtier, list);
/*
* find_next_best_node, use 'used' nodemask as a skip list.
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void establish_migration_targets(void)
* Once we detect such a memory tier, we consider that tier
* as top tiper from which promotion is not allowed.
*/
- list_for_each_entry_reverse(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
nodes_and(used, node_states[N_CPU], memtier->nodelist);
if (!nodes_empty(used)) {
top_tier_id = memtier->id;
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void establish_migration_targets(void)
*/
nodes_and(lower_tier, node_states[N_MEMORY], lower_tier);
- list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
/*
* Keep removing current tier from lower_tier nodes,
* This will remove all nodes in current and above
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-20 2:59 [PATCH v10 0/8] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-26 3:53 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-26 11:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-27 1:16 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-28 17:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] mm/demotion: Move memory demotion related code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] mm/demotion: Add hotplug callbacks to handle new numa node onlined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-26 4:03 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-26 12:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-27 1:53 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-27 4:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-28 6:42 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's performance level to MEMTIER_PERF_LEVEL_PMEM Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-21 6:07 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-25 6:37 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-25 6:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-25 8:35 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-25 8:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-26 2:13 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-27 4:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-28 6:39 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-20 3:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2022-07-21 0:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-26 7:44 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-26 12:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-27 1:40 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-27 4:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-28 6:51 ` Huang, Ying
2022-08-03 3:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-08-04 4:19 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] mm/demotion: Add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-26 8:02 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-26 8:24 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-20 2:59 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-25 8:54 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-25 8:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jzch2sl.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hesham.almatary@huawei.com \
--cc=jvgediya.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.