From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Palethorpe Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:18:09 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Wrapper for Syzkaller reproducers In-Reply-To: <8b3cbf25-83ad-42da-f3ec-e2bafdfff97c@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200609113421.10936-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <20200609165921.GA28805@dell5510> <20200609195851.GA29515@x230> <8b3cbf25-83ad-42da-f3ec-e2bafdfff97c@linuxfoundation.org> Message-ID: <874krjxuby.fsf@our.domain.is.not.set> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hello, Shuah Khan writes: > On 6/9/20 1:58 PM, Petr Vorel wrote: >> Hi Shuah, >> >> ... >>>> I don't have any particular comments. >>>> I assume Richard tested it and it works. if so, it's fine with me :) >>>> I don't have any concrete plans to use this at the moment. We have a >>>> corpus of reproducers in syzkaller format and we can run these. This >>>> should be more useful for kernel continuous integration systems and >>>> distro testing. >> >>> Right. That is what I was thinking that this is more relevant for kernel >>> developers, CI and distros. >> >>> Richard, Please send the patch for linux-arts to me once Petr gives it a >>> try and I will apply it. >> NOTE: this patch is for LTP. But maybe I miss something (some other patch for >> linux-arts I overlooked). >> > > Possibly I misread the > > V3: > + Updated linux-arts commit (thanks Dmitry and Shuah for updating those!) > + Fixed AC macro > > If this patch doesn't intend to update syzkaller-repo, there is > nothing to do for linux-arts. I thought that this patch is for > Dmitry's syzkaller repo I update from and looking get this into > linux-arts directly. > > Since this is LTP patch, ignore my comments. Sorry for the noise. > > thanks, > -- Shuah No problem at all, I should have made that more clear. Infact I will send a seperate patch to linux-arts mentioning the LTP wrapper. -- Thank you, Richard.