All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
Cc: rjones@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	amit@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:03:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874l62sei2.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190510081526.15507-1-kchamart@redhat.com> (Kashyap Chamarthy's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 10:15:25 +0200")

Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> writes:

> When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> `/dev/urandom`.  However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> entropy is available).
>
> Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
>     "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
>     time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
>     of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted.  It will return random
>     bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
>     entropy pool, blocking if necessary.  /dev/random is suitable for
>     applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
>     indeterminate delays."
>
> Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
>
>     "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
>     /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
>     exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
>     time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
>     because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
>
>     "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
>     major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
>     output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
>     root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
>     perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys.  Since reads
>     from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
>     nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
>     sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
>     available."
>
> And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> `/dev/urandom`.

This is Linux.  What about other supported POSIX[*] hosts?  If any such
host has /dev/random that works here, but not /dev/urandom, we regress.

*If* there's an actual regression risk: a simple & stupid way to reduce
it risk could be falling back to /dev/random when opening /dev/urandom
fails.  Perhaps only when it fails with ENOENT.

Possible implementation: instead of setting a default filename in
rng_random_init(), change rng_random_opened() to try /dev/urandom, then
/dev/random when filename is still null.

Aside: "opened" sounds like a predicate.  Goes back to commit
a9b7b2ad7b0.

> Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> Related discussion in these[1][2] past threads.
>
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08335.html
>     -- "RNG: Any reason QEMU doesn't default to `/dev/urandom`?"
> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02724.html
>     -- "[RFC] Virtio RNG: Consider changing the default entropy source to
>        /dev/urandom"
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>

[*] POSIX because
common-obj-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += rng-random.o


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-10 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10  8:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10  8:28 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10  9:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-10  9:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-05-10 12:03 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-05-10 12:11   ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874l62sei2.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=amit@kernel.org \
    --cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.