From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51E3ECE560 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E3320883 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 55E3320883 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728469AbeIPXaM (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 19:30:12 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:51527 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728230AbeIPXaM (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 19:30:12 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1g1bRE-0007bj-6t; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 12:06:28 -0600 Received: from [105.184.227.67] (helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1g1bRD-0004M6-3P; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 12:06:28 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Linus Torvalds References: <87musyl3fa.fsf@xmission.com> <87lg81pbe2.fsf@xmission.com> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:06:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lg81pbe2.fsf@xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2018 20:04:05 +0200") Message-ID: <874leppbad.fsf_-_@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1g1bRD-0004M6-3P;;;mid=<874leppbad.fsf_-_@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=105.184.227.67;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+Veq2h+Tjtc/v7Ibn/MHjojq7VwCKmAP8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 105.184.227.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: [PATCH 3/4] signal: Remove specific_send_sig_info X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This function is static and it only has two callers. As specific_send_sig_info is only called twice remembering what specific_send_sig_info does when reading the code is difficutl and it makes it hard to see which sending sending functions are equivalent to which others. So remove specific_send_sig_info to make the code easier to read. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- kernel/signal.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index ec136fda457a..99e91163c9a3 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1199,12 +1199,6 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p) return send_signal(sig, info, p, PIDTYPE_TGID); } -static int -specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t) -{ - return send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID); -} - int do_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type) { @@ -1254,7 +1248,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t) */ if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && !t->ptrace) t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE; - ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, t); + ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags); return ret; @@ -2330,7 +2324,7 @@ static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info) /* If the (new) signal is now blocked, requeue it. */ if (sigismember(¤t->blocked, signr)) { - specific_send_sig_info(signr, info, current); + send_signal(signr, info, current, PIDTYPE_PID); signr = 0; } -- 2.17.1