From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zVrkQ272zzDrCf for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:01:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0U2xURG039941 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:01:31 -0500 Received: from e14.ny.us.ibm.com (e14.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.204]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ftdcbwvc4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:01:31 -0500 Received: from localhost by e14.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:01:30 -0500 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e14.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.201) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:01:28 -0500 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0U31So739125120; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:01:28 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE5EAC03A; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:02:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from birb.localdomain (unknown [9.81.201.128]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E3E1EAC051; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:02:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by birb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 018184F0DAB; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:01:23 +1100 (AEDT) From: Stewart Smith To: Brad Bishop , OpenBMC Maillist Subject: Re: OpenBMC 1/29 community telecon - Call for Topics In-Reply-To: <6DB8F483-15F5-407D-8150-DC66F5E00C53@fuzziesquirrel.com> References: <9330D13C-79E8-4C49-BBEA-EAB55E9C5974@fuzziesquirrel.com> <7F891E7C-D7BE-46B8-AE07-3A900334A6F2@fuzziesquirrel.com> <6DB8F483-15F5-407D-8150-DC66F5E00C53@fuzziesquirrel.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:01:22 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18013003-0052-0000-0000-000002AB6DE3 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008451; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000248; SDB=6.00982323; UDB=6.00498093; IPR=6.00761605; BA=6.00005799; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00019278; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-01-30 03:01:29 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18013003-0053-0000-0000-00005367EA98 Message-Id: <874ln4124d.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-30_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801300037 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:01:34 -0000 Brad Bishop writes: > I=E2=80=99d like to talk about how OpenBMC might support systems with BMC= redundancy. > Please join to discuss if that is interesting to you. Interesting! Considering in a past life I worked on high availability clustered databases, I may be able to contribute some design/design review around some of these parts. --=20 Stewart Smith OPAL Architect, IBM.