From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: "Vetter, Daniel" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb()
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874m3ffy8g.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161109173825.GL6536@intel.com>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:21:22PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> >> One of the memsets was added by 5a920b85f2c6 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB
>> >> partitioning for multi-screen cases"), and the other was added by
>> >> 01c72d6c17 ("drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen
>> >> cases"). I'm confused and I'll let the maintainers find out what went
>> >> wrong here.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>> >
>> > I think this is just an artifact of having the patch in both -next and
>> > -fixes. The context probably changed later in -next causing a conflict
>> > when the two were merged, and then the merge resolution accidentally
>> > duplicated this hunk. The merge commit ac4139ed7 is where we wound up
>> > with the two copies:
>>
>> I don't have that merge commit. Is that a nightly rebuild?
>
> Yeah, it's part of a nightly rebuild. Looks like
> 82282577545 is the equivalent now.
>
>> I don't think we even have this issue in anywhere other than
>> nightly. There isn't a branch we could apply this fix to.
>
> Yeah, the patch can't apply anywhere directly, but I thought we could
> make rerere forget its resolution of intel_pm.c for that merge and then
> fix it by hand so that future merges behave correctly?
Only if it was a manual fixup that went wrong. For silent conflicts, we
need to add a fixup patch for the merge.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > index db24f89,cc9e0c0..88e28c9
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> > @@@ -3361,11 -3404,13 +3404,17 @@@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc
>> > unsigned int total_data_rate;
>> > int num_active;
>> > int id, i;
>> > + unsigned plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > + unsigned plane_y_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};
>> > +
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >
>> > + /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> > + memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> > + memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> > +
>> > if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> > return 0;
>> >
>> > Dropping one looks good to me.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> >
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ----
>> >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> index 88e28c9..cc9e0c0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> >> @@ -3411,10 +3411,6 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>> >> memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >>
>> >> - /* Clear the partitioning for disabled planes. */
>> >> - memset(ddb->plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->plane[pipe]));
>> >> - memset(ddb->y_plane[pipe], 0, sizeof(ddb->y_plane[pipe]));
>> >> -
>> >> if (WARN_ON(!state))
>> >> return 0;
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 2.7.4
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 17:21 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove duplicated memsets in skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() Paulo Zanoni
2016-11-08 18:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-09 1:13 ` [PATCH] " Matt Roper
2016-11-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2016-11-09 17:38 ` Matt Roper
2016-11-10 10:03 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874m3ffy8g.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.