From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agVK0-0003I5-Ec for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:38:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agVJw-0006Xh-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:38:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:37144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agVJv-0006XQ-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:38:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p65so110680745wmp.0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 03:38:23 -0700 (PDT) References: <1457086720-30391-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <87fuvxt2f9.fsf@linaro.org> <20160317101309.GD6310@redhat.com> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20160317101309.GD6310@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:38:20 +0000 Message-ID: <874mc59yoz.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: Introducing docker tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, Fam Zheng , sw@weilnetz.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini , jsnow@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Daniel P. Berrange writes: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:16:58PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Fam Zheng writes: >> >> > v3 changes: >> >> I think we are almost there. There a just a few tweaks to be made to >> help text and prompts. Can you ensure that all examples in commit >> messages and help text actually do run as expected? >> >> Is it proposed this goes through Daniel's treee? > > What tree is that you're referring to ? I certainly don't consider > myself the maintainer of all tests in QEMU :-) I'd say that Fam > is maintainer of tests/docker/ and should thus just send PULL for > it request(s) directly You are right of course. I picked your name up as the master of the build system but really this is all new stuff. I just wasn't sure if the process for new functionality was to go direct to Peter or via a related tree and then take over the specific bits. > > > Regards, > Daniel -- Alex Bennée