From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Gobinda Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sysfs: disallow world-writable files.
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:32:05 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mnyxtk2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB_aHcxDvUnqNaEJDhQ7e1Jd4U3-qvV1=99uyiBfD1384jku5g@mail.gmail.com>
Gobinda Maji <gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Rusty,
Hi Gobinda,
> I have a small doubt about the permission restriction (User perms >=
> group perms >= other perms) in VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS(). Please Note
> that permission field of User, Group or Other consists of three bits.
> LSB is EXECUTE permission, MSB is READ permission and the middle bit
> is WRITE permission. Say for example, permission value is "0431". Here
> User has only READ permission whereas Group has both WRITE and EXECUTE
> permission and Other has EXECUTE permission. I guess, it is not good
> to give Group the WRITE permission whereas User itself has no WRITE
> permission.
You're absolutely right, well spotted! The checks can be tightened. We
don't really care about execute, but logically write is "more
privileged" than read.
Best to separate the tests; OTHER_WRITABLE <= GROUP_WRITABLE <= OWNER_WRITABLE
and OTHER_READABLE <= GROUP_READABLE <= OWNER_READABLE.
A patch would be welcome!
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 12:10 [PATCH 9/9] sysfs: disallow world-writable files Gobinda Maji
2015-04-30 2:02 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-01 11:59 Gobinda Maji
2014-04-22 3:33 [PATCH 0/9] Avoid world-writable sysfs files Rusty Russell
2014-04-22 3:33 ` [PATCH 9/9] sysfs: disallow world-writable files Rusty Russell
2015-04-29 12:24 ` Gobinda Charan Maji
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874mnyxtk2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=gobinda.cemk07@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.