From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Abhishek L <abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] normalizing radosgw
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:14:18 +0530
Message-ID: <874mt4u0hp.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1412061025330.18213@cobra.newdream.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:48004 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751200AbaLISos (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:44:48 -0500
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id eu11so1076469pac.22
        for <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:44:48 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1412061025330.18213@cobra.newdream.net>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-users@ceph.com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Sage Weil writes:
[..]
> Thoughts?  Suggestions?
>
[..]
Suggestion:
radosgw should handle injectargs like other ceph clients do?

This is not a major annoyance, but it would be nice to have.


=2D-=20
Abhishek

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; name="signature.asc"; description="Digital signature"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUh0MCAAoJEPnwZB8bZe1fnhUH/iO7ktRNJZpIKSogi4Ac+HIL
YBT5H924EJGaPEydQBzzQhF9S6Y9F2rKe/VzzFlSDAoNZajOUr2UCHg+D3XRHy+E
lh7rh4dPlDVo2beMVG3UCAxje2mmIgzNgRt6/wmwKDXl9Yhh49l08n5OdRQFJiX8
NMoUqLhfhfAzfvqB0bFyUcUKFc6nesslaXkEKy8JVVKnr3Iy+E4Yy/0qDH2Vyh7i
iVRO6b1XnsXT1tPLTANeKj1qstVe5afRQiYVB11eVgzppx8V4uJhOzErxypjcho3
HuTJtxLwoN2SGK3McRvWj5F6f87xqWPnZtE0x4F0paYHQnn6T4jUtYpa+Yx2MYA=
=whqW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--