From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULFCI-0004jT-Pj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:57:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULFCH-0003Qp-GG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:57:02 -0400 Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.145]:49488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULFCG-0003Ku-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:57:01 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 01:49:29 +1000 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.21]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199EA2CE804C for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:56:27 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r2SFuLMo5570844 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:56:22 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r2SFuP31026618 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:56:25 +1100 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: References: <1363358063-23973-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <51545EAE.6010909@suse.de> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:56:19 -0500 Message-ID: <874nfvjz6k.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] Remove sysbus_add_memory and sysbus_del_memory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rbe?= =?utf-8?Q?r?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Michael Walle , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org Peter Maydell writes: > On 28 March 2013 15:15, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> Ping! >> >> All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including that of >> the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to arm-devs.next, no? > > Well, I could, but they're not really arm patches and I kind of > feel like one of the reasons my pullreqs are accepted is because > I don't stuff unrelated patches into them. I'll apply these.. In the future, please CC me when sending patches like this. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > -- PMM