From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 07:12:21 -0700 Message-ID: <874nronn0a.fsf@ti.com> References: <20120403092524.GD17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120403094749.GH17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120403123444.GL17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <878vicsxef.fsf@ti.com> <20120403160706.GP17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <87ehs4pfw4.fsf@ti.com> <20120404111524.GF32505@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120426180719.GC20186@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FA45580.8070802@ti.com> <87ipg76hfm.fsf@ti.com> <4FA8284C.7080803@ti.com> <87k40nzi3i.fsf@ti.com> <4FA8FCFF.40105@ti.com> <4FA9588E.9020906@ti.com> <87sjfal65t.fsf@ti.com> <4FAA4DB9.8060504@ti.com> <4FAAB1A3.9040806@ti.com> <4FAAC549.6010206@ti.com> <4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog134.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.83]:33032 "EHLO na3sys009aog134.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932130Ab2EJOM3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 10:12:29 -0400 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so2205406pbb.0 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:12:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com> (Jon Hunter's message of "Wed, 9 May 2012 16:45:08 -0500") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" , Paul Walmsley , Ming Lei , Will Deacon , Maynard Johnson , "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net" , Lik Lik , "eranian@gmail.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Jon Hunter writes: [...] > I have posted my latest series here [1] based upon that from Will [2] > which attempts to fix the EMU CD based upon the inputs from this thread. > It is working on my omap4460 panda. There are some differences between 4430 and 4460 here. Can you test on 4430 as well? Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 07:12:21 -0700 Subject: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter In-Reply-To: <4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com> (Jon Hunter's message of "Wed, 9 May 2012 16:45:08 -0500") References: <20120403092524.GD17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120403094749.GH17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120403123444.GL17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <878vicsxef.fsf@ti.com> <20120403160706.GP17741@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <87ehs4pfw4.fsf@ti.com> <20120404111524.GF32505@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20120426180719.GC20186@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <4FA45580.8070802@ti.com> <87ipg76hfm.fsf@ti.com> <4FA8284C.7080803@ti.com> <87k40nzi3i.fsf@ti.com> <4FA8FCFF.40105@ti.com> <4FA9588E.9020906@ti.com> <87sjfal65t.fsf@ti.com> <4FAA4DB9.8060504@ti.com> <4FAAB1A3.9040806@ti.com> <4FAAC549.6010206@ti.com> <4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com> Message-ID: <874nronn0a.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Jon Hunter writes: [...] > I have posted my latest series here [1] based upon that from Will [2] > which attempts to fix the EMU CD based upon the inputs from this thread. > It is working on my omap4460 panda. There are some differences between 4430 and 4460 here. Can you test on 4430 as well? Kevin