From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: assume maintainership Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:44:48 -0400 Message-ID: <874nssy17j.fsf@laptop.org> References: <1331821836-14641-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120315173047.GB17243@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:39221 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752507Ab2DIWot (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:44:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120315173047.GB17243@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:30:47 +0000") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Per Forlin , Ulf Hansson , Linus Walleij , Pawel Moll Hi Russell, On Thu, Mar 15 2012, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> From: Linus Walleij >> >> So since this driver is crucial for us (as in ST-Ericsson) >> to have actively maintained, and since it is marked orphaned >> I will assume maintainership for it starting with the 3.5 >> integration cycle. The idea is to collect patches and send >> either patch sets of pull requests to Chris. > > Actually, I still want to be involved because I'm far from convinced with > some of the patches coming from Ulf are correct for ARMs implementation. > That's why I'm purposely not applying the MMCI patches in the patch system > in a particularly fast manner - I want there to be a decent amount of > testing between each set of patches. > [..] > So, it's not really unmaintained or orphaned... Please could you send a MAINTAINERS patch to Linus adding yourself for MMCI? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child