From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c-ocores: add some device tree documentation Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:02:36 +0100 Message-ID: <874oa3qner.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <1290615982-1028-1-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> <1290615982-1028-4-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> <20101224040017.GE2491@angua.secretlab.ca> <1293183537.8652.4236.camel@satguru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1293183537.8652.4236.camel@satguru> (Jonas Bonn's message of "Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:38:57 +0100") Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jonas Bonn Cc: Grant Likely , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Bonn writes: Hi, Jonas> PS: Honestly not crazy about the name 'i2c-ocores' either as it Jonas> doesn't match the name of the upstream Verilog project which is Jonas> called, unfortunately, simply 'i2c'. This driver, however, has Jonas> been upstream for a while so I guess we're stuck with it. Yes, it was more or less the best name I could come with. Just calling it i2c.c wouldn't have been any good either. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard