From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cdc_ether.c: Add SE J105i to device whitelist
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:50:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874omyqoxy.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262846321.3608.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Dan Williams's message of "Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:38:41 -0800")
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> writes:
> Here's the difference:
>
> F3507g: requires AT command setup before cdc-ether port is usable
> SE j105i: does not require AT command setup before port is usable
>
> Same on my TM-506; you can simply run DHCP on the 'usb0' port and it
> works, because the phone is pretending to be a usb-ethernet device and
> transparently bridge between the ethernet and the cellular network.
> That's simply not the case with the F3507g or any other WWAN card.
>
> Phones are fundamentally different than WWAN cards and shouldn't be
> treated like one, at least at this time.
OK, then I misunderstood the request. I thought that this phone behaved
like a WWAN card since it presumably advertised the same CDC "Mobile
Direct Line" class as the Ericsson WWAN cards, maybe even with the same
GUID in the MDLM header?
If it really behaves like you describe (which is what the other Sony
Ericsson phones I've seen does too), then I don't understand why it
doesn't just advertise a CDC Ethernet class device. That's what the
other phones do, and as you of course know, the reason why we don't have
a gazillion phone VID/PID entries in cdc_ether.c..
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-23 20:56 [PATCH] net: cdc_ether.c: Add SE J105i to device whitelist Thomas Loo
2009-12-23 21:48 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-04 14:50 ` Bjørn Mork
2010-01-04 21:10 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-05 7:34 ` Bjørn Mork
2010-01-05 11:31 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-05 12:46 ` Bjørn Mork
2010-01-05 20:52 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-01-07 6:38 ` Dan Williams
2010-01-07 8:50 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2010-01-07 16:21 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874omyqoxy.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.